Feeds

EMC 'rebalancing' workers

So they can stand up straight in unemployment line?

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

Storage giant EMC said today that it will “rebalance” its work force to the tune of 1,000 positions even as it revealed it will beat its own expectations for the fourth quarter.

In a somewhat opaque statement, said that on December 30 it approved a plan which would result in “increased focus on new product development and the company’s ability to focus on new product development and the company’s ability to target, reach and support more customers around the globe.”

This will affect around 1,000 positions the firm says. Does that mean EMC supreme Joe Tucci is hanging up the “Hiring” sign? Er, not quite. Read on and the statement says it will be taking a cash charge of around $80m to cover the cost of employee separation benefits.

This at the same time it announced preliminary fourth quarter revs of $2.7bn to $2.71bn, with earnings per share, excluding items such as the worker rebalancing charge, coming in at $0.17, which is at the top end of its projections. Full year revs will be $9.65bn to $9.66bn.®

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Whitepapers

A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.