Sobering up fast
The other fascinating technology found in the $100 computer is its wireless mesh networking, first developed at MIT’s Media Lab. This sort of organic proximity network and "viral broadband" (PDF) can be used to build an ad-hoc communications system, and could one day revolutionize social networks and the way people communicate - much like the internet itself. It’s ideally suited to use TCP/IP and can be highly effective even in parts of the world where the internet does not yet exist.
I have been trying to discover some middle ground between the pristine vision of the "green computer" for every child and Bill Gates’ dream of a personal computer on every desktop - not two entirely different visions, I might add. As a visionary and a respected, powerful leader, Gates made his dream come true - and without any foresight into security, we are faced with the massive exploitation of the zero-day vulnerability we have today. Not only did Gates’ great vision make him the world’s richest man in the process, it also made him one the most generous - with an incredible $28.8 billion dollars in the Bill & Melinda Gates charitable foundation, here is a man who truly makes a difference in our world. With such good intentions, it’s too bad his software is so often found vulnerable to malicious use.
It is with some irony, therefore, that most of the world’s computers run Gates’ software but are now terribly vulnerable to exploitation, digital theft and criminal activity even as I write this. Hundreds of millions computers are vulnerable to the whims of just about any website owner, virus writer, or hacker with malicious intent. I can think of a thousand different ways to lure someone into full system compromise using this zero-day vulnerability - and I don’t think this is the vision Gates had ever dreamed of.
Contrast this with the vision of MIT’s $100 computer - and the view of it as an extremely safe, secure place for children to learn and grow. The goal is to build hundreds of millions of these machines, too. It’s unlikely that Gates would support it, though, as it will be running a flavour of Linux on AMD. It’s unlikely that Intel will support it as well, which might be the reason why it is one of the few organizations openly critical of MIT’s initiative. I hope both can step back from the technology for a moment, just as Negroponte has done, and focus on the betterment of the world through children, for a change.
On the surface, the MIT green computer and the Microsoft Windows XP computer seem to be entirely different, and in many ways they are. They take radically different approaches to what is, ironically, the same goal: using technology to make the world a better place. We’ve seen what happens with a monopoly of like systems designed around the legacy and poor security of yesteryear; let’s hope the upcoming MIT computer for children offers us a glimpse of a much more secure and socially responsible world.
This article originally appeared on SecurityFocus
Copyright © 2006, SecurityFocus
Sponsored: Are DLP and DTP still an issue?