Feeds

Opteron beats 'Dempsey' Xeon in performance- per-Watt test

Intel's 'Bensley' platform benchmarked

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Intel's upcoming 65nm, dual-core Xeon DP processor, 'Dempsey', is fast, but its performance comes at the cost of some serious power consumption, a pre-production test using the chip giant's 'Bensley' platform has shown.

The trial was conducted by website Anandtech, which immediately went off and ran the same benchmarks and power consumption measurements on a comparably configured Opteron 280-based rig.

According to the site's report, the 3.46GHz Dempsey, allied with Intel's 'Blackford' chipset, which supports the dual-core CPU's twin, independent 1066MHz frontside buses, was the clear performance leader, beating the Opteron in both the SQL and order-entry stress tests by 15.9 per cent and three per cent, respectively.

When it came to power consumption, however, the Opteron took the lead, gobbling up 34 per cent, 40.9 per cent and 44.7 per cent less power, respectively, under idle, mid-range and maximum load configurations.

Intel is particularly keen on discussing performance per Watt these days, but it's not likely to include Dempsey in the conversation, at least not if Anandtech's results are anything to go by. Such is the Opteron 280's lead in overall power consumption that despite offering less raw performance than the Xeon, it takes the performance-per-watt crown too.

To see how that might matter to an IT manager, the report calculates that it costs $8,160 more to run the pre-production Bensley-based system - comprising 40 servers - than a similar Opteron rig each year, based on the test results. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Official: European members prefer to fondle Apple iPads
Only 7 of 50 parliamentarians plump for Samsung Galaxy S
Fujitsu CTO: We'll be 3D-printing tech execs in 15 years
Fleshy techie disses network neutrality, helmet-less motorcyclists
Space Commanders rebel as Elite:Dangerous kills offline mode
Frontier cops an epic kicking in its own forums ahead of December revival
Intel's LAME DUCK mobile chips gobbled by CASH COW
Chipzilla won't have money-losing mobe unit to kick about anymore
First in line to order a Nexus 6? AT&T has a BRICK for you
Black Screen of Death plagues early Google-mobe batch
Ford's B-Max: Fiesta-based runaround that goes THUNK
... when you close the slidey doors, that is ...
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.