Intel's upcoming 65nm, dual-core Xeon DP processor, 'Dempsey', is fast, but its performance comes at the cost of some serious power consumption, a pre-production test using the chip giant's 'Bensley' platform has shown.

The trial was conducted by website Anandtech, which immediately went off and ran the same benchmarks and power consumption measurements on a comparably configured Opteron 280-based rig.

When it came to power consumption, however, the Opteron took the lead, gobbling up 34 per cent, 40.9 per cent and 44.7 per cent less power, respectively, under idle, mid-range and maximum load configurations.

Intel is particularly keen on discussing performance per Watt these days, but it's not likely to include Dempsey in the conversation, at least not if Anandtech's results are anything to go by. Such is the Opteron 280's lead in overall power consumption that despite offering less raw performance than the Xeon, it takes the performance-per-watt crown too.

To see how that might matter to an IT manager, the report calculates that it costs $8,160 more to run the pre-production Bensley-based system - comprising 40 servers - than a similar Opteron rig each year, based on the test results. ®

Related stories

• AMD's server share is no chimera (26 January 2006)
• AMD ships dual-core gaming CPU (10 January 2006)
• AMD admits low-end desktop chips in short supply (23 December 2005)
• Analysis Second-class Intel to trail AMD for years (29 October 2005)
• Intel's Paxville: too slow, too hot, too dumb (20 October 2005)
• IDF Brute force attack planned by Intel to blunt AMD's edge (24 August 2005)
• IDF Intel promises Windows Vista on handhelds (23 August 2005)
• Intel brings forward 90nm dual-core Xeons (16 August 2005)
• Intel pitches Pentium M-based 'Sossaman' server chip (29 July 2005)
• Computex 2005 Intel exposes 65nm dual-core Xeons (31 May 2005)
• IDF Spring 05 Intel preps Truland, Bensley Xeon platforms (1 March 2005)