Amazon triumphs in 1-Click patent defence
IPXL appeal rejected
Posted in Financial News, 25th November 2005 14:51 GMT
Free whitepaper – Vulnerability management buyer's checklist
Amazon.com has successfully defended a claim that its famous 1-Click payment feature infringed another company's patent for an electronic fund transfer or transaction system. IPXL Holdings had been seeking around $50 million in damages.
Amazon.com's 1-Click system allows customers to make repeat purchases at a website with just one mouse click, storing customer details for future use. It enforced its own patent for 1-Click in a high-profile case against rival bookseller Barnes & Noble.com.
But in January 2004, Virginia-based IPXL sued Amazon.com, alleging that Amazon.com was infringing an electronic fund transfer system patent.
In August 2004, District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that four of the patent claims on which the suit was based were invalid due to prior art (they were already in the public domain) and that the fifth and final claim was invalid because it was indefinite.
IPXL appealed, but on Monday lost its case before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Appeals Court upheld the findings of invalidity, and therefore did not consider whether the 1-Click feature had actually infringed upon the patent.
See:
- IPXL's patent
- The Appeal Court's ruling (17-page / 65KB PDF)
Copyright © 2005, OUT-LAW.com
OUT-LAW.COM is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.
Free whitepaper – Vulnerability management buyer's checklist

Analyst Keynote: The Register Agile Data Center Summit
Enabling The Agile Data Center
Analyst Keynote: The Register Agile Data Center Summit

Google Spanner — instamatic redundancy for 10 million servers?
Early adopters bloodied by Ubuntu's Karmic Koala
Fedora 12 polishes Linux for netbooks
Sign up, sign up for The Register IT security newsletter