Feeds

Flash famine a threat, warns Creative

Investments not products produce Q1 profit

Boost IT visibility and business value

Creative saw its sales slide sequentially in its first quarter and was only able to declare a net income thanks to a big investment gain, the MP3 player maker and Apple rival said today.

Revenues for the three months to 30 September 2005 - Creative's first quarter of fiscal 2006 - came to $280.2m, up 33.4 per cent on the year ago quarter but 8.3 per cent down on the previous quarter's $305.4m.

Creative reported a net income of $700,000 (one cent a share), but subtract the effect of a $10m investment gain and the company lost $9.3m (11 cents a share). Q1 FY2006's profit compares with a Q1 FY2005 net income of $4.8m (six cents a share) and a $31.9m (38 cents a share) net loss in Q4 FY2005.

At least the company's gross margins improved significantly from the previous quarter's 10.1 per cent to 20.2 per cent. That, plus a 123 per cent year-on-year increase in MP3 player shipments and an eight per cent reduction in the firm's inventory stockpiles, bodes well for the future.

However, company president Craig McHugh admitted that the company is facing a shortage of 1GB solid-state memory chips. The Flash famine is "primarily a result of a special deal that Apple has secured from a key supplier for the holiday season", he said. That supplier is believed to be Samsung. "This will impact availability of our 1GB flash MP3 players for the holiday quarter," he added.

Still, the company wants to get fully into the black by the end of the calendar 2005, and McHugh believes Creative has made progress toward realising that goal.

In Q1 FY2006, 66 per cent of the company's revenues came from MP3 players, compared to 44 per cent in the year-ago quarter. However, in Q4 FY2005, it was 68 per cent. Plug those numbers into Creative's overall quarterly revenues, and it emerges portable music player revenue fell 10.7 per cent sequentially. Creative didn't say how many players it shipped last quarter, but it's likely to be a lot fewer than the 6.5m iPods Apple sold in the same period. ®

Build a business case: developing custom apps

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Judge nixes HP deal for director amnesty after $8.8bn Autonomy snafu
Lawyers will have to earn their keep the hard way, says court
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.