Feeds

BT and OneTel lock horns over mis-selling dispute

Not pretty

Eight steps to building an HP BladeSystem

BT and OneTel are locked in a bitter war of words over allegations of mis-selling phone services.

The UK's dominant fixed line telco said it has settled a long running legal dispute after Centrica Telecommunications Ltd, which owns OneTel, gave written undertaking that it would "not infringe BT's trade marks or pass itself off as BT".

The undertakings followed what BT described as "serious complaints from members of the public that Centrica's sales agents had misled customers into thinking that Centrica was in some way connected to BT".

Had Centrica failed to co-operate BT would have been prepared to issue legal proceedings.

Now OneTel has hit back, claiming BT's decision to publicise the agreement was done not to protect consumers but to "damage the OneTel name".

Said OneTel MD Ian El-Mokadem: "By publicising our signing of undertakings in regard to IP Infringement BT are attempting to infer that Onetel has not had controls in place previously. Clearly, their desire is to damage the Onetel name.

"Onetel already has the strictest controls in place and on that basis we have signed the undertakings. 

"One has to ask why, having co-operated in this way, BT insisted on publicising this matter.

"Our strong belief is that BT's actions are nothing to do with consumer protection and everything to do with damaging their most successful competitor," he said.

Last week regulator Ofcom confirmed that UK's 35 leading phone operators have all introduced guidelines to prevent their staff from mis-selling phone services.

However, the regulator continues to trawl through thousands of complaints to see if they warrant a full-blown investigation into the sales tactics of certain operators. Telcos in breach of the rules can be fined up to 10 per cent of their turnover.

In August BT secured an out of court settlement against Caudwell Communications Ltd (CCL) for "infringement of registered trade marks and for passing off".

The High Court action, which kicked off in May, followed customer complaints that CCL's sales agents had misled customers into thinking that the company was in some way connected to BT. ®

Bridging the IT gap between rising business demands and ageing tools

More from The Register

next story
Auntie remains MYSTIFIED by that weekend BBC iPlayer and website outage
Still doing 'forensics' on the caching layer – Beeb digi wonk
Apple orders huge MOUNTAIN of 80 MILLION 'Air' iPhone 6s
Bigger, harder trouser bulges foretold for fanbois
GoTenna: How does this 'magic' work?
An ideal product if you believe the Earth is flat
Telstra to KILL 2G network by end of 2016
GSM now stands for Grave-Seeking-Mobile network
Seeking LTE expert to insert small cells into BT customers' places
Is this the first step to a FON-a-like 4G network?
Yorkshire cops fail to grasp principle behind BT Fon Wi-Fi network
'Prevent people that are passing by to hook up to your network', pleads plod
BlackBerry: Toss the server, mate... BES is in the CLOUD now
BlackBerry Enterprise Services takes aim at SMEs - but there's a catch
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.