Feeds

Apple 'readies' dual-core Power Mac G5s

IBM chip to drive series before Intel switch - report

Apple is likely to ship Power Mac G5 desktops based on dual-core IBM PowerPC processors, perhaps by the end of the month.

So claims Think Secret, citing unnamed sources who said the update will come earlier than planned because of allegedly weak demand for the latest single-core systems.

Apple last updated the Power Mac G5 line in April, bumping the top-end two-processor 2.5GHz model to 2.7GHz. Two months later, CEO Steve Jobs announced the transition to Intel processors, just ahead of IBM's formal announcement of the much-rumoured dual-core PowerPC 970MP.

It's the 970MP that will drive the new Power Mac line-up, the sources claim. While the part is not expected to clock above 2.7GHz, by equipping each two-processor machine with four processing cores instead of two, Mac users should see a hefty performance increase.

Apple Expo Paris takes place next week, and despite the company's no-show for a keynote, it's suggested that it may use the exhibition to give the 970MP-based Power Macs their first public appearance.

The sources also claimed Apple's PowerBook line will not now be updated before January 2006. ®

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.