AMD vs Intel Dell has told the US District Court of Delaware it will comply with AMD's request for documents that the upstart chip maker believes will prove Intel engaged in anti-competitive business practices.

The PC giant filed notice of its intentions with the court earlier this week. The filing notes the company's plan to make "good-faith efforts" to retrieve email and other documents requested by AMD in a broad subpoena served on Dell in July.

AMD launched its action against Intel (http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2005/06/30/amd_japan_sues_intel/) in June, and quickly followed it up by serving document preservation and presentation requests on more than 30 companies. So far, only NEC and UK retail chain Dixons have objected to AMD's orders.

NEC told the court (http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2005/07/29/amd_vs_intel_3/) in July that it believes AMD's requests are "vague and overly broad", and "seek materials irrelevant to the subject matter of this litigation".

Dixons has denounced (http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2005/07/11/dixons_amd_intel/) AMD's allegations as "poorly researched and false".

Dell is the only major PC vendor not to buy processors from AMD as well as Intel. As such, its business dealings with the chip giant will be closely examined by AMD for hints that Intel went beyond the boundaries of good business practice to keep Dell Intel-only.

Certainly it is a widely held belief that Intel makes it worth Dell's while to source microprocessors only from Intel. It is also believed that such benefits helped persuade Apple to turn to Intel when it decided to migrate the Mac from PowerPC to x86 processors.

For its part, Dell maintains bringing AMD on board would increase its costs, according to comments made by company executives in the past.

Intel last week formally rejected (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/02/intel_lawsuit_response/) AMD's allegations, paving the way for the trial. In three weeks' time, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation will meet to judge a request that AMD's litigation be joined to a number of other anti-Intel class action lawsuits and transferred to the US District Court of Northern California. AMD has filed its disapproval (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/18/amd_vs_intel_5/) of such a move. ®

Related stories

Germans hand EC evidence on Intel (12 September 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/12/intel_markt_amd/
AMD, Intel and others to serve 100 subpoenas (23 June 2006)
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/06/23/amd_intel_serve_subpoenas/
AMD's lawyers go fishing in Redmond (14 April 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/14/amd_ms_docs/
AMD calls on Skype for Intel anti-trust evidence (2 March 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/02/amd_subpoenas_skype/
AMD wins access to Japanese Intel anti-trust 'evidence' (16 December 2005)
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2005/12/16/amd_wins_jftc_evidence_access/
US media tries to block AMD-vs-Intel gagging orders (2 December 2005)
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2005/12/02/amd_intel_press_gagging_fears/
Dell 'sourcing AMD-based PCs from Taiwan' (21 November 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/21/dell_amd_pcs/
AMD-Intel legal battle will not go West (10 November 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/10/amd_vs_intel_jpml/
Dell embraces AMD chips for courtroom duty? (9 November 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/09/dell_athlon_amd/
Algorithms no match for sales craft, Dell discovers (3 November 2005)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2005/11/03/dell_salescraft/
Show us your paperwork - AMD (6 October 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/06/amd_produce_intel/
Judge sets AMD, Intel disclosure date (3 October 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/03/amd_vs_intel_oct/
Intel and Dell update server gear with promises and rhetoric bump (26 September 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/26/intel_dell_pax/
Intel rejects AMD's antitrust allegations (2 September 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/09/02/intel_lawsuit_response/
AMD rejects request to send Intel case to California (18 August 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/18/amd_vs_intel_5/
AMD pursues NEC, Fujistu (12 August 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/12/and_vs_intel_4/
NEC rejects AMD subpoena demands (29 July 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/29/amd_vs_intel_3/
AMD's battle with Intel to go west? (22 July 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/22/amd_vs_intel_2/
Date set for Intel's response to AMD antitrust claims (15 July 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/15/amd_intel_update/
Dixons disses AMD claims (11 July 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/11/dixons_amd_intel/
AMD wants Intel evidence from 30 firms (4 July 2005)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2005/07/04/amd_wins_intel_info/
AMD Japan sues Intel for $50m damages - and then some (30 June 2005)
http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2005/06/30/amd_japan_sues_intel/