Feeds

UK.gov IT procurement to be discrimination-free

Vendor- or platform-specific IT tenders nixed

The British government has brought its IT procurement procedures into line with European directives that demand technology projects must not specify specific brands of microprocessor.

The directive was issued after a European Commission investigation revealed a number of EU member states were mandating the use of Intel processors in IT projects. The probe was prompted by complaints from AMD which believed it was being discriminated against.

The EC made it clear at the time that Intel itself was not responsible for or directly connected to the wording of the discriminatory contracts and tender documents. The alleged discrimination arose out of an emphasis on clock speed as the key processor performance measure. Since Intel's clock speeds were higher than AMD's, tenders seeking the highest-performance solution were insisting on Intel-based hardware.

The UK was not one of the states under investigation, but the Office of Government Commerce this month issued its version of the non-discriminatory technical specification guidelines set down in the Europe-wide regulations.

According to the new rules, "contracting authorities must specify requirements in generic technical or performance terms", and "hardware specifications should... exclude any reference to minimum processor clock speeds".

Brand-specific terms or "terms which refer to materials or goods of specific origin" may only be used "if justified by the subject of the contract", the rules state. Even then, contracts must include an "or equivalent" clause.

"Contracting authorities must consider offers which claim to satisfy the requirements in an equivalent manner even though they do not conform to the standard in question," the guidance reveals, which neatly extends tendering beyond, say, the x86 world to other processor platforms. In other words, an Apple-based solution has as much of a shot at the target as a Wintel one, even if the contract specifies an x86-based hardware solution, performance and functionality equivalence can be shown.

On the subject of performance, contracting authorities "may refer to a minimum score on an independent benchmark text measuring microprocessor performance", though they also need to ensure "non-discriminatory scores are set on these tests".

The full guidelines can be viewed here. ®

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.