Feeds

SGI closes painful 2005 with a thud

Massive restructuring underway

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

SGI warned that fourth quarter revenue would come in well below expectations and today revealed the accuracy of this forecast.

The hardware maker posted revenue of $172m. Earlier this month, it told investors to expect revenue between $170m and $175m - a range well down from an earlier forecast of revenue up to $200m. SGI has initiated a major restructuring plan and looks to announce the details of its scheme sometime during the current quarter.

"Our fourth quarter showed sequential revenue and bookings growth, and the lowest operating expenses for the fiscal year," said SGI CEO Bob Bishop. "Nevertheless, we need to accelerate the turnaround and strengthen our financial position going forward."

SGI has delivered a confusing message to investors, blaming the fourth quarter miss on a failure to close two, large deals, while at the same revealing that larger structural problems may actually be responsible for the poor performance. It has bought the services of a turnaround specialist Alix Partners to help with reducing expenses, boosting revenue and dealing with debt.

In the fourth quarter, SGI reported a loss of $16.4m, which compares to a loss of $7.5m one year earlier.

For the full fiscal year, SGI brought in $730m and showed a net loss of $76m. Those figures compare with revenue of $842m and a loss of $100m last year.

SGI has struggled to revive its hardware business despite trying to expand beyond its line of MIPS-based Irix servers. It has promoted systems with Intel's Itanium processor running Linux and secured some nice wins with this pairing. Of recent note, NASA used a massive SGI system for extensive work launching the Discovery shuttle. The sales, however, of large Itanic systems have not rolled in at a high enough pace to boost revenue on a major scale.

Shares of SGI barely moved in the after-hours markets, sitting at $0.72 per share at the time of this report. ®

Related stories

DoD picks Opteron as weapon of mass simulation
Intel slaps 'wide load' tag on new Itanium
SGI shares plummet as deal closing malady lingers
IBM and Intel punish supercomputing rivals
SGI sees red

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
Oracle hires former SAP exec for cloudy push
'We know Larry said cloud was gibberish, and insane, and idiotic, but...'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.