Feeds

FTC cracks down on email smut barons

Bang to rights

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Remote control for virtualized desktops

The US Federal Trade Commission last week launched a crack down on xxx-rated spam with legal action against seven firms that have allegedly flouted laws requiring warning labels on smutty emails. Four of the seven companies agreed to pay a total of $1.159m in penalties and to abide by federal rules requiring warning labels on emails with sexually-explicit content and the US federal CAN-SPAM Act.

BangBros.com of Florida will pay $650,000 in civil penalties; Michigan-base MD Media will pay $239,000; APC Entertainment of Florida will shell out $220,000 and Pure Marketing Solutions of Florida and Internet Matrix Technology of Louisiana will together fork out $50,000.

Three other operations are fighting lawsuits, initiated by the FTC, which seek the imposition of civil penalties and a permanent bar on their allegedly illegal marketing activities. The defendants (TJ Web Productions of Nevada; Cyberheat of Arizona and Impulse Media of Washington) are accused of running "affiliate marketing" programs in which they paid others to send spam on their behalf rather than doing the dirty dead themselves. That still makes them liable under the CAN-SPAM Act.

Firms sending racy emails without appropriate warnings have activists all steamed up. "This x-rated e-mail is electronic flashing," said Lydia Parnes, director of the bureau of consumer protection. "It exposes kids and other unwary consumers to graphic sexual content, and it is unwanted, offensive, and illegal."

The FTC’s Adult Labeling Rule and the related US Federal CAN-SPAM Act require bulk mailers of sexually-explicit material to use the phrase "SEXUALLY EXPLICIT: " in the subject line of the email message and to ensure that the initially viewable area of the message does not contain graphic sexual images. Consumers also need to be offered the opportunity to opt-out of receiving further emails, another frequent shortcoming of the firms targeted for legal action. ®

Related stories

UK workers still circulating lewd and racist email
UK firm fingered in US XXX spam probe
FTC fines porn spammers $112k
SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT: FTC labels porno spam

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
BIG FAT Lies: Porky Pies about obesity
What really shortens lives? Reading this sort of crap in the papers
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Go beyond APM with real-time IT operations analytics
How IT operations teams can harness the wealth of wire data already flowing through their environment for real-time operational intelligence.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?