Feeds

Rambus reports record revenue

But 'challenge' to forecast future

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Rambus last night reported net income of $5.4m (five cents a share) on sales of $40m for the three months to 30 June 2005.

The memory technology developer and serial litigator's second quarter revenues were up one percentage point sequentially and up 14 per cent over the year ago quarter's total. Rambus heralded the figure as a quarterly revenue record-breaker, the second in succession.

New contracts contributed $5.4m to the $40m revenue, down 18 per cent on the previous quarter although one percentage point up on Q2 FY2004. The reason for the decline: fewer new deals for the company's XDR memory and FlexIO technologies now that the initial big deals with companies developing products around the Cell processor come to a conclusion, Rambus said.

Royalty revenues were up 17 per cent year on year and five per cent sequentially, the gains coming from growing SDRAM and DDR royalty payments, the company added.

The quarter's net income was up 22.7 per cent sequentially, but down 34.9 per cent year on year.

Rambus spent $34.4m in costs and expenses during the quarter, up from $24.4m in Q2 FY2004. More than half of that increase - $5.2m - arose from the company's legal activity, already a big cost centre. During the quarter, Rambus launched legal proceedings against Samsung, alleging its XDR licensing partner had separately infringed dozens of patents it holds that it maintains are central to the way DDR 2 memory devices operate.

Rambus did not provide guidance for Q3 or Q4's sales and earnings, stating that "the second half of the year is a challenge to forecast given the number of patent license agreements and renewals we are currently negotiating". ®

Related stories

Rambus unveils 8GHz XDR 2
IBM licenses Rambus XDR interface
Rambus counter sues Samsung
Samsung countersues Rambus
Rambus sues Samsung
Rambus calls on co-founder to forecast future
FTC claims Rambus spoiled antitrust evidence

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.