Judge Legal set aside in MS antitrust case
Still has the best name...
Posted in Financial News, 11th July 2005 14:04 GMT
Understand how application security is evolving
Microsoft's EU antitrust case has been moved to The Grand Chamber, according to reports, where the company's appeal will be heard by a new panel of 13 judges. The case was taken away from Judge Hubert Legal, and he is to have no further involvement in the proceedings.
Legal originally oversaw the panel of five judges that had been dealing with the appeal. Now 13 judges will have to decide whether or not to uphold, even in part, the Commission's original ruling against the software firm, which saw the company ordered to open its protocols to competitors and hit with a hefty fine.
An unnamed court official told Reuters: "I can confirm that the case has been moved to the Grand Chamber".
The same report claims, again citing unnamed sources, that Judge Legal was removed because an article he wrote annoyed fellow judges. Judge Bo Vesterdorf first proposed that Legal should be removed, after the article was published.
In the article, Legal suggested that law clerks might have inappropriate influence on some judges. He also used the phrase "ayatollahs of free enterprise", in connection with these same officials. ®
Related stories
Microsoft is profiting from punishment - rivals
Microsoft - EC case may get new judge
MS and EU inch towards agreement


The future of SaaS and IT infrastructure management
The Total Economic Impact of Dell's PC products and services
The best practices guide for application security
Avoiding 7 common mistakes of IT security compliance
The starter PKI program

Win a Samsung C6625!
Is your cameraphone an oxymoron?
Windows 7, Bing and security: Mr Ballmer regrets
Sign up, sign up for The Register IT security newsletter