Feeds

SGI shares plummet as deal closing malady lingers

Eyes penny stock status

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

SGI today lurched towards penny stock territory after announcing a huge fourth quarter revenue miss.

The server maker, in a preliminary forecast, warned investors to expect revenue between $170m and $175m for the period. Previously, SGI had predicted revenue to come in between $180m and $200m. Shares of SGI dropped more than 15 per cent, at the time of this report, hitting 59 cents - a new 52-week low. For the quarter, SGI expects to post a loss of approximately $15m to $18m.

SGI blamed the unexpected shortfall on its failure to close two large deals worth more than $15m. "The Company is working diligently to finalize these installations."

No kidding.

In an ominous note for employees, SGI warned that it is "closely reviewing its expense structure and expects to adopt additional restructuring actions this quarter" as a result of the revenue miss. It, however, seems odd to blame a couple of slow-closing deals for the bad quarter only to insist later that the whole company must be restructured to avoid revenue misses in the future. Which one is it? One-time problem or large scale issues?

SGI has tried to revitalize its business by moving away from homemade processors and its specialized IRIX operating system to Linux running on Intel's Itanium chip. Itanium sales, however, have fallen painfully below expectations - so much so that analyst powerhouse IDC missed a 2004 Itanic sales forecast by 95 per cent or $26.6bn. Oops.

The only company to enjoy anything approaching recent success with Itanium is HP, which owns the vast majority of the Itanic server market.

SGI continues to have a stellar reputation in its core market, delivering high-performance systems to labs and companies in need of serious graphics horsepower. And with SGI's market cap at just $157m, one wonders how long the likes of IBM or Sun Microsystems can resist adding this compute hungry customer base to their server lines.

SGI will report full fourth quarter results on July 28. It blamed a failure to close deals for a third quarter miss as well

Related stories

IBM and Intel punish supercomputing rivals
Intel to add memory controllers to future Xeons, Itanics
Itanium and Opteron fight for significance
SGI sees red
Intel misses Itanium sales mark by $26.6bn

Build a business case: developing custom apps

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
VMware's high-wire balancing act: EVO might drag us ALL down
Get it right, EMC, or there'll be STORAGE CIVIL WAR. Mark my words
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
VMware vaporises vCHS hybrid cloud service
AnD yEt mOre cRazy cAps to dEal wIth
prev story

Whitepapers

A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.