Feeds

SGI shares plummet as deal closing malady lingers

Eyes penny stock status

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

SGI today lurched towards penny stock territory after announcing a huge fourth quarter revenue miss.

The server maker, in a preliminary forecast, warned investors to expect revenue between $170m and $175m for the period. Previously, SGI had predicted revenue to come in between $180m and $200m. Shares of SGI dropped more than 15 per cent, at the time of this report, hitting 59 cents - a new 52-week low. For the quarter, SGI expects to post a loss of approximately $15m to $18m.

SGI blamed the unexpected shortfall on its failure to close two large deals worth more than $15m. "The Company is working diligently to finalize these installations."

No kidding.

In an ominous note for employees, SGI warned that it is "closely reviewing its expense structure and expects to adopt additional restructuring actions this quarter" as a result of the revenue miss. It, however, seems odd to blame a couple of slow-closing deals for the bad quarter only to insist later that the whole company must be restructured to avoid revenue misses in the future. Which one is it? One-time problem or large scale issues?

SGI has tried to revitalize its business by moving away from homemade processors and its specialized IRIX operating system to Linux running on Intel's Itanium chip. Itanium sales, however, have fallen painfully below expectations - so much so that analyst powerhouse IDC missed a 2004 Itanic sales forecast by 95 per cent or $26.6bn. Oops.

The only company to enjoy anything approaching recent success with Itanium is HP, which owns the vast majority of the Itanic server market.

SGI continues to have a stellar reputation in its core market, delivering high-performance systems to labs and companies in need of serious graphics horsepower. And with SGI's market cap at just $157m, one wonders how long the likes of IBM or Sun Microsystems can resist adding this compute hungry customer base to their server lines.

SGI will report full fourth quarter results on July 28. It blamed a failure to close deals for a third quarter miss as well

Related stories

IBM and Intel punish supercomputing rivals
Intel to add memory controllers to future Xeons, Itanics
Itanium and Opteron fight for significance
SGI sees red
Intel misses Itanium sales mark by $26.6bn

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.