Feeds

Linux lovers must wait until 2007 for SCO vs IBM showdown

Trial delayed for bit of Palmisano

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

The SCO Group's quest for software IP righteousness looks set to linger on until at least 2007 after a judge pushed back the trial date for the company's battle with IBM.

A five-week jury trial will now begin on Feb. 26, 2007, as a result of a recent ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Dale Kimball. As the case hobbles to trial, SCO will now also have a chance to depose IBM's CEO Sam Palmisano in this dispute over whether or not bits of Unix owned by SCO illegally made their way into Linux thanks to IBM. The previous trial date, already delayed twice itself, was Nov 1.

"The court finds that Mr. Palmisano could have unique personal knowledge related to the claims in this action," the judge wrote. "Thus, IBM must produce Mr. Palmisano for a deposition. . . . Although SCO seeks a seven-hour deposition, the court imposes a limit of four hours, not including any breaks taken during the deposition. "

In addition, the judge denied SCO's bid to amend its complaint for a third time. The proposed change would have charged IBM with violating copyright agreements around its Project Monterey software by putting Unix System V Release 4 code into IBM's AIX OS for its Power chips. (Much more on Monterey is available here.)

"[T]he court finds that SCO has unduly delayed seeking leave to assert the proposed cause of action," the judge wrote. "It appears that SCO–or its predecessor either knew or should have known about the conduct at issue before it filed its original Complaint. Accordingly, the court declines to permit the filing of a Third Amended Complaint."

For those who have lost track, SCO originally filed suit against IBM way back in March of 2003, seeking billions in damages. Since then, lawsuits have gone out against Red Hat, Novell and Linux customers. SCO once claimed it would present clear evidence of IBM's misdeeds. The court, however, has chided the software maker for failing to produce much in the way of evidence at all.

Happy waiting. ®

Related stories

Novell versus SCO will go to court
SCO watches Q2 revenue and loss shrink
IBM and Red Hat to teach Uni students how not to get offshored
Sun acquires oldSCO for $25m
SCO, Groklaw and the Monterey mystery that never was
SCO makes Unix revenue disappear in Q1

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week
Rebranded OS reportedly set to be flung open by Redmond
'In... 15 feet... you will be HIT BY A TRAIN' Google patents the SPLAT-NAV
Alert system tips oblivious phone junkies to oncoming traffic
Apple: SO sorry for the iOS 8.0.1 UPDATE BUNGLE HORROR
Apple kills 'upgrade'. Hey, Microsoft. You sure you want to be like these guys?
SMASH the Bash bug! Red Hat, Apple scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
'Google is NOT the gatekeeper to the web, as some claim'
Plus: 'Pretty sure iOS 8.0.2 will just turn the iPhone into a fax machine'
ARM gives Internet of Things a piece of its mind – the Cortex-M7
32-bit core packs some DSP for VIP IoT CPU LOL
'People have forgotten just how late the first iPhone arrived ...'
Plus: 'Google's IDEALISM is an injudicious justification for inappropriate biz practices'
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.