Feeds

AMD ships 64-bit Semprons

Head to head with Intel

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

AMD has begun shipping 64-bit Sempron processors in a bid to counter Intel's launch of 64-bit Celeron chips earlier this month.

Overnight, five Sempron desktop chips were added to AMD's official price list: the 2600+, 2800+, 3000+, 3100+ and 3300+. All five chips are Socket 754 parts, and were already available as 32-bit products, as per the Sempron standard up until this point.

Indeed, since the Socket 754 Semprons are essentially AMD64 chips with parts of the L2 cache and 64-bit processing disabled, it was undoubtedly relatively easy for AMD to make the move.

Support for 64-bit processing comes at a small premium: while the model numbers are identical, the 64-bit versions of a given Sempron CPU are between $3 and $6 more expensive than the 32-bit incarnations. In each case they are still cheaper than the Socket A variants.

The 2600+, 2800+, 3000+, 3100+ and 3300+ cost $74, $83, $98, $113 and $140, respectively. Prices are per processor in batches of 1000 chips. ®

Related stories

AMD to drive dual-core downmarket
AMD wants Intel evidence from 30 firms
AMD Japan sues Intel for $50m damages - and then some
AMD and MS dig deep to free the freebies for 64-bit PC fans
AMD files anti-trust suit against Intel
AMD ships world's 'fastest overclockable gaming CPU'

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.