Feeds

Firemen challenge £31m planned IT bill

Money that could save lives

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has accused the government of wasting money on expensive IT consultants instead of ploughing funds into the fire service itself.

Information obtained under the Freedom of Information Act from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) reveals that £31.1m has been budgeted for IT consultants, as part of the emergency fire control project. The FBU warns that this is close to eclipsing the £42.3m the government estimates will be saved by the project. That figure was leaked from a confidential ODPM report earlier in the year.

However, an ODPM spokeswoman said that the FBU was distorting the figures, and that the £31m was the estimated cost of "professional support to the project over its whole lifetime".

She added that the full cost of the project was £988m, meaning that fees paid to IT consultants accounted for just three per cent of the total.

"The FireControl project is itself a result of an independent review of fire and rescue control rooms by Mott MacDonald, which concluded that current arrangements were costly and inefficient," she said. "When the Government consulted widely on the report in December 2003 there was broad support for the new approach."

The FireControl Project will consolidate the 46 local fire control offices across England into nine regional control offices. The FBU says that the new system in unnecessary, expensive and will not save any lives. It argues that the £31m earmarked for consultants would be better spent on 1,000 additional fire fighters, or on arson reduction initiatives.

"They are wasting money on IT consultants chasing another technology rainbow. There is no pot of savings at the end of this rainbow," said FBU General Secretary Matt Wrack. "This is very expensive, very risky project and it won't save any lives. They must bin it before they waste any more public money."

138 cross-party MPs have now signed Early Day Motion 229, or its amendment, raising concerns about the project. ®

Related stories

ODPM to withdraw from eGovernment policy
Public sector IT abuse still rife
Public beats private for IT pay rises

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
MI6 oversight report on Lee Rigby murder: US web giants offer 'safe haven for TERRORISM'
PM urged to 'prioritise issue' after Facebook hindsight find
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
NSA mass spying reform KILLED by US Senators
Democrats needed just TWO more votes to keep alive bill reining in some surveillance
'Internet Freedom Panel' to keep web overlord ICANN out of Russian hands – new proposal
Come back with our internet! cries Republican drawing up bill
What a Mesa: Apple vows to re-use titsup GT sapphire glass plant
Commits to American manufacturing ... of secret tech
prev story

Whitepapers

Choosing cloud Backup services
Demystify how you can address your data protection needs in your small- to medium-sized business and select the best online backup service to meet your needs.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Designing and building an open ITOA architecture
Learn about a new IT data taxonomy defined by the four data sources of IT visibility: wire, machine, agent, and synthetic data sets.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?