Feeds

Vendors enjoy storage swell again in Q1

EMC and Dell charge hard

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Storage sales shot up once again during the first quarter, as customers continued to shell out major cash for systems big and small.

Worldwide sales of external disk-based storage systems hit $3.8bn in the quarter - up 7 per cent from the same period last year, according to researcher IDC. Total disk-based storage system sales grew 6 per cent to $5.5bn. That's the eighth quarter in a row of positive growth from the storage sector.

As proof that the need for storage capacity far outstrips revenue gains, IDC noted that vendors shipped 409 petabytes worth of disk in the quarter - a whopping 59 per cent increase year-over-year.

"Storage spending is clearly trending upward as organizations strive to stay ahead of their information storage demands,” said Brad Nisbet, an analyst at IDC. "After nearly two years of positive momentum, spending on storage systems, particularly those priced less than $300,000, continues to be a top priority in the ongoing efforts to expand and rebuild IT infrastructure."

EMC and Dell showed once again that partnering pays in the storage game. The storage allies posted the strongest revenue growth with 12.2 per cent and 29.2 per cent rises in sales, respectively.

EMC dominated the market with 21.4 per cent share, while HP followed with 18 per cent and IBM capped the top three with 12 per cent. Hitachi took the forth spot 9 per cent of sales and Dell had 8 per cent.

In the total networked storage market, which combines NAS (network attached storage) with Open and iSCSI SAN (storage area network) sales, EMC remained number one with 29 per cent of the market. HP finished second with 20 per cent share. "Dell and Network Appliance posted the strongest year-over-year revenue growth for the quarter among the top 5 vendors, with 47.1 per cent and 29.7 per cent growth, respectively," IDC said.

The NAS market grew faster than the storage segment as a whole by boosting sales 17 per cent year-over-year. EMC again took the lion's share of sales with 38 per cent share followed by Network Appliance with 34 per cent share.

The rest of the IDC data is available here

Related stories

Sun critics hear the sound of two garbage trucks colliding
Sun sheds $4.1bn for StorageTek
NetApp opens fire on EMC
NetApp busts through banner Q4

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.