Feeds

m-commerce security risks exposed

Stacking the odds against safety

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

Vulnerabilities in mobile applications offer a way to attack otherwise secure web sites, according to independent security consultancy SecureTest.

SecureTest has demonstrated how hackers can break into a mobile phone application, modify the code and use this as a tool to manipulate the website itself. The demo featured a fictitious gambling website with a horse-racing betting application and a standard Sony Ericsson P900 smartphone running freeware software tools. A series of input validation attacks on the mobile web application allowed SecureTest to modify the J2ME mobile phone betting application source code. The compromised application was then used as a route to access the website and modify the content of a database containing live betting odds.

The website used a firewall-protected server which had been further secured using the IIS Lockdown security tool. Despite only ports 80 (HTTP) and 443 being accessible, SecureTest was still able to carry out the attack. The server was running XP SP2 instead of Windows 2003 or Linux either of which might be a more common choice in practice. Nonetheless SecureTest said its demo shows how easy it is to exploit application flaws - rather than conventional OS vulnerabilities - to mount hacking attacks.

Almost half - 670 of 1,403 - of the security bugs logged by Symantec in the second half of 2004 affected web applications. These figures reflect the rising growth of applications as a source of security problems, which has been apparent for at least two years or so to security pros if not the wider IT community. SecureTest's research simply illustrates that vulnerabilities in mobile-based transactional web applications might be even easier to exploit than previously thought.

As a leading UK penetration testing firm, the issues SecureTest raises are more than a little self serving, though that doesn't mean its necessarily wrong. It advises end users to test web applications at the application layer and to consider all routes into a network, including mobile devices and even trusted connections with third parties, during regular security audits. ®

Related stories

Drive-by Trojans exploit browser flaws
Smart phones make inroads in business
Mobile Trojan kills smart phones
Mobile virus epidemics: don't panic

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Goog says patch⁵⁰ your Chrome
64-bit browser loads cat vids FIFTEEN PERCENT faster!
Chinese hackers spied on investigators of Flight MH370 - report
Classified data on flight's disappearance pinched
KER-CHING! CryptoWall ransomware scam rakes in $1 MEEELLION
Anatomy of the net's most destructive ransomware threat
NIST to sysadmins: clean up your SSH mess
Too many keys, too badly managed
Scratched PC-dispatch patch patched, hatched in batch rematch
Windows security update fixed after triggering blue screens (and screams) of death
Researchers camouflage haxxor traps with fake application traffic
Honeypots sweetened to resemble actual workloads, complete with 'secure' logins
prev story

Whitepapers

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup
Learn why inSync received the highest overall rating from Druva and is the top choice for the mobile workforce.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.