Feeds

Google puts the brake on Web Accelerator

Cache from chaos

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL

Google has disabled downloads of its Web Accelerator software less than a week after introducing the service. The suspension follows reports that the software was caching sensitive content, such as user control panels to online forums.

The beta application, a free browser plug-in that for use with IE 5.5 and above or Firefox 1.0 on Win 2000 or XP, is designed to speed up online surfing. Google stopped downloads on 11 May just six days after its 5 May release saying that the capacity limit of the trial had been reached. "We have currently reached our maximum capacity of users and are actively working to increase the number of users we can support," it said in a statement on the Web Accelerator home page.

The technology used information including data about user search patterns to pre-fetch and cache frequently requested content, thereby speeding access to (basic) web content. Analyst Gartner said the application had limited appeal because it wouldn't help to download media files any faster. It wasn't long before privacy activists started raising questions of their own about the service.

Aside from giving Google unprecedented insight into user's surfing habits the application came under fire from punters for caching sensitive information, such as user control panels from forums. As a result surfers with the software installed reported they were getting logged onto forums such as SomethingAwful.com as other users. There's no suggestion that online banking records on other content from secure ecommerce sites was turning up in the cache. The disquietening behaviour seems to be limited to sites visited by many other beta users of the software.

Google has s yet to respond to our repeated requests for comment. ®

Related stories

Google DNS glitch sparks hacking fears
Botnets strangle Google Adwords campaigns
Google plugs brace of GMail security flaws
Major flaw found in Google Desktop

The next step in data security

More from The Register

next story
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Infosec geniuses hack a Canon PRINTER and install DOOM
Internet of Stuff securo-cockups strike yet again
'Speargun' program is fantasy, says cable operator
We just might notice if you cut our cables
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
YouTube, Amazon and Yahoo! caught in malvertising mess
Cisco says 'Kyle and Stan' attack is spreading through compromised ad networks
Hackers pop Brazil newspaper to root home routers
Step One: try default passwords. Step Two: Repeat Step One until success
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
Microsoft to patch ASP.NET mess even if you don't
We know what's good for you, because we made the mess says Redmond
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.