Feeds

PC dealer sues Apple over Tiger

Alleges Mac OS X 10.4 brandname infringes trademark

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

US reseller Tiger Direct has sued Apple, claiming the Mac maker's decision to name the latest version of the Mac OS after the same feline predator infringes its trademark.

Worse, the plaintiff claims, by adopting the name Tiger, Apple has "overwhelmed the computer world with a sea of Tiger references", displacing the reseller from Internet search engine results, and in turn materially harming its business, it believes.

Bloomberg reports that Miami-based Tiger Direct, part of Systemax, is seeking an injunction against the allegedly trademark-infringing Apple product. It's after legal costs and damages, too. Tiger Direct maintains it has held a number of Tiger-related trademarks since 1987. Apple's use of the word is "causing confusion, mistake and deception among the general purchasing public", apparently.

Apple announced Mac OS X 10.4 'Tiger' almost a year ago, so you have to question Tiger Direct's motivation in suing the company the day before it's about to launch the product, which goes on sale at 6PM today.

The OS' launch will go ahead - a hearing to discuss the injunction request will not take place until next week.

It's not the only legal battle over trademarks the Mac maker is involved in. Don't forget, the company is still slugging it out with The Beatles' recording company Apple Corporation over its move into the music market with iTunes. Then there's Apple's tussle with the late astronomer Carl Sagan, after it used his surname as a codename for one of its desktops. Apple renamed the machine 'BHA', allegedly standing for 'Butt-head Astronomer'.

More particularly, Mac OS X 'Tiger' features a technology called Bonjour. It's not a new component, rather a new name for an old feature, Rendezvous. The name change was forced on the company because it was sued by the company that owns the Rendezvous trademark, business software developer Tibco.

Apple has itself sued many other companies, alleging they made their products look a little too like its own, icon-based offerings.

If Tiger Direct's lawsuit fails, the company will have got its name in front of countless computer users who, like us, had never even heard of it until today. If that doesn't materially benefit its business, we don't know what will. Perhaps Apple should demand commission for allowing it to reach new buyers this way... ®

Related stories

Book giant feels wrath of Jobs
French consumer group sues Apple, Sony
Apple sues three over 'Tiger' Mac OS X leak
Apple threatens iTunes.co.uk owner
Apple coughs up for iTunes Music Store patent
Apple sued over use of Rendezvous trademark

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
Application security programs and practises
Follow a few strategies and your organization can gain the full benefits of open source and the cloud without compromising the security of your applications.
The Essential Guide to IT Transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIO's automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise.