Feeds

Web attacks soar

Insecure apps let hackers run riot

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Web server attacks and website defacements rose 36 per cent last year, according to an independent report. zone-h, the Estonian security firm best known for its defacement archive, recorded 392,545 web attacks globally in 2004, up from 251,000 in 2003.

Mass defacements (322,188) were by far the largest category in 2004. More targeted cyber graffiti attacks numbered 70,357. zone-h also recorded 186 attacks on US governmental servers out of 3,918 attacks on government domains worldwide. Separately the security consultancy recorded 49 assaults on US military servers.

zone-h estimates that 2,500 web servers are successfully hacked each day out of a total population of 45m servers. Roberto Preatoni, founder of zone-h, told El Reg that PHP bugs and SQL injection attacks were the most common tricks used by hackers in order to access to vulnerable systems. In previous years, zone-h noted whether Windows or *nix systems were likely to be attacked. Preatoni said such comparisons have become pointless because 70 per cent of attacks are based on exploiting application vulnerabilities, which often exist across different OS platforms.

Preatoni said the increased population of web servers was largely responsible for the rise in the number of attacks zone-h noted last year. The increased complexity of software plays an important but lesser role, he said. zone-h speculates the number of attacks will skyrocket once VoiP/3G phones become commonplace even though such devilish exploits are yet to be developed.

Cyber activists carrying out hacks for political purposes and (more commonly) attention seekers are among those who deface websites. But gangs competing among themselves cause the most amount of damage. "Some have even developed automatic tools to notify us on the defacement so they don't have to bother," Preatoni said. ®

Related stories

Security Report: Windows vs Linux
South Pole 'cyberterrorist' hack wasn't the first
Net survives mass-defacement contest

Related links

zone-h’s study

Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL

More from The Register

next story
Spies would need SUPER POWERS to tap undersea cables
Why mess with armoured 10kV cables when land-based, and legal, snoop tools are easier?
Early result from Scots indyref vote? NAW, Jimmy - it's a SCAM
Anyone claiming to know before tomorrow is telling porkies
Jihadi terrorists DIDN'T encrypt their comms 'cos of Snowden leaks
Intel bods' analysis concludes 'no significant change' after whistle was blown
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Hackers pop Brazil newspaper to root home routers
Step One: try default passwords. Step Two: Repeat Step One until success
China hacked US Army transport orgs TWENTY TIMES in ONE YEAR
FBI et al knew of nine hacks - but didn't tell TRANSCOM
Microsoft to patch ASP.NET mess even if you don't
We know what's good for you, because we made the mess says Redmond
NORKS ban Wi-Fi and satellite internet at embassies
Crackdown on tardy diplomatic sysadmins providing accidental unfiltered internet access
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.