Feeds

DoH broadens technology choice for GPs

Lays out hoops for jumping suppliers

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

GPs in England are to get a wider choice of computer systems, under new plans announced today by the Department of Health. The range of available suppliers has been extended to include approved partners of the government-appointed Local Service Providers.

Local service providers were finally appointed in January last year. The government split the country into five areas and invited IT firms to bid for each regional franchise, as part of the National Programme for IT.

Health Minister John Hutton said: "Throughout the development of new IT systems for the NHS we have listened carefully to what front-line clinicians want from them. GPs have told us they want a wider choice of systems to use and I am pleased we can deliver this."

Suppliers will make it onto the eligble list if they a) have a contract with one of the LSPs, b) can demonstrate the required level of inter-operability with NPfIT systems, and c) can present a sound business case for their inclusion. The systems must also be capable of being hosted in a data centre to enable GP-to-GP data transfer, electronic transmission of prescriptions, Choose and Book electronic appointment booking, and other countrywide services.

A Medix survey of doctors, published in February, revealed that GPs are most concerned about the lack of consultation with family doctors at the planning stages and about the potential risk to patient confidentiality. Subsequently, the NPfIT appointed someone to oversee communication between the programme and GPs.

The imposition of a technology solution has also been raised as an issue. Under the new arrangement, surgeries will be able to chose from a wider range of companies. Eligible suppliers now include EMIS, which has recently signed a contract with CSC, the Local Service Provider for the North West and Midlands. ®

Related stories

NPfIT boss prepares to cut failing suppliers
GPs have no faith in £6bn NHS IT programme
Flagship NHS project in danger

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.