Feeds

Big Blue goes after the little guy

Small and medium businesses

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

IBM is going after small and medium businesses and the white box server vendors who serve them.

Talking at IBM's Partnerworld conference in Las Vegas Bill Zeitler, group executive of IBM Systems and Technology Group, said the Small and Medium Business market was growing faster than other markets and IBM had to do better in that market.

Big Blue will aim to compete with white box vendors(no-brand boxes) with its Blade servers and newly-announced X3 boxes. More details on Infoworld here.

In not unrelated news IBM announced a $300m spend on helping resellers go after the SMB market. SMB customers already provide more than 20 per cent of IBM's revenues. IDC estimates the SMBs will spend $360bn in 2005 on IT.

IBM consultants will partner with regional systems integrators in Europe and the US. IBM will offer preconfigured mySAP solutions targetted at smaller firms. Partners in the US will be able to resell IBM hosting services to SMB clients. More details on IBM's website here.®

Related stories

SMEs slap hard cash on the IT table
IBM ASP'ifies Siebel CRM
IBM begins $500m iSeries revamp

Whitepapers

Choosing cloud Backup services
Demystify how you can address your data protection needs in your small- to medium-sized business and select the best online backup service to meet your needs.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.