Skip to content

Biting the hand that feeds IT

The Register ®

Security:


Related Whitepapers

[Print][Mobile][Alerts]

Regulate this

Government health warning over stricter IT laws

Published Friday 18th February 2005 09:31 GMT

RSA 2005 The role of government in regulating the IT industry sparked sharp debate at this week's RSA Conference.

Richard Clarke, former White House cyber-security advisor, and cryptographer Bruce Schneier argued for the benefits greater regulation might bring against opposition from Harris Miller, president of the IT Association of America, and Rick White, president of TechNet. Clarke said that he opposed regulation of the IT industry while in government but a deteriorating security landscape has prompted him to change his opinion.

"We have a choice of a world where viruses, DDoS and spam are a reality and one where they are not," Clarke said. Schneier agreed adding the fact ISPs fail to provide a secure connection as a crime. "Hook up to broadband and not requiring use of a firewall is the equivalent of producing cars without seat belts," he said.

Big buyer better than Big Brother regulations

In the red corner, Miller argued regulations only serve to create a "messy bureaucracy" and impede innovation. Existing laws are adequate, he added.

Compliance with corporate regulations - like Sarbanes Oxley - was a major theme of this year's RSA Conference. Increased auditing and controls have encouraged enterprises to overhaul their security architectures. The panellists at a To Regulate or not regulate: that is the question discussion at this week's RSA Conference in San Francisco to didn't agree on much but they all agreed that it didn't make much sense for accounting firms to be setting standards in computing.

Miller said it was up to industry to come with standards by itself but Schneier said suppliers would continue to follow insecure practices as long as they could if it allowed them to be more profitable. "Companies are not charities they do things because competition demands it or customers demand it or regulation demands it. The capitalist imperative is not in line with the result society wants so we can demand a change through regulation. Regulation changes the trade off companies make," Schneier said.

Clarke said attempts to resist regulation could backfire on the IT industry. "After a major incident you would end up which much stricter regulations," he said. ®

Related stories

Tough local laws drive corporate security
Anti Sarbanes-Oxley mood rises in Europe
Compliance costs UK.biz dear
Q: What does risk mean to you?
Corporate governance goals impossible - RSA

RSA 2005

All the Reg stories from this year's conference

Track this type of story as a custom Atom/RSS feed or by email.
Previous Article Next Article
whitepaper title

Gartner Paper: US Data Centers

U.S. enterprise data centers face considerable space and energy constraints over the next few years. Download this free independent report to read more..
whitepaper title

The Perfect (Virtual) Marriage

Get consistent virtual machine storage savings of 50% (often as high as 90%) with virtually no performance impact with NetApp deduplication..
Whitepapers

Top 20 storiesAll The Week’s HeadlinesArchiveSearch