Feeds

UK LLU roll-out 'continues to lag'

But BT insists it's 'committed' to unbundling

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The failure of BT to hit key performance targets for local loop unbundling (LLU) is still frustrating operators keen to invest in advanced telecoms services. The problem is so bad that some operators are putting their marketing plans on hold while BT gets its house in order.

And this, from an incumbent telco that brags about showing a "willingness over the years to work constructively with industry" and insisting that it has an "excellent track record of compliance with its regulatory obligations".

However, telecoms adjudicator Peter Black reports in his latest update on the progress of LLU that "overall delivery performance continues to lag the KPIs this is inhibiting some marketing plans causing slower take up than expected", despite BT increasing the number of staff working on LLU.

He goes on: "I reported previously that significant operational problems remain but most operators were seeing improvements. These improvements, whilst trending in the right direction, are somewhat variable from week to week. This is due to a number of factors, not least the legacy systems, legacy processes, manual processes and manual interventions necessary by BT and LLUOs [LLU operators]. This has been frustrating the industry's ability to hit the KPIs we collectively set."

In particular, the unbundling of telecoms lines are only "Right First Time" is way off the mark and only meets customers' expectations anywhere between 50 - 60 per cent of the time. Yet the target set was that lines should be unbundled correctly first time 75 per cent of the time by February 2005 and rising to 85 per cent "in the near future".

So far, 31,000 lines have been unbundled - well short of the 50,000 target set.

Although 14 companies are showing "encouraging signs of investment commitment", regulator Ofcom accepts that LLU operators "continue to experience operational problems and variable delivery performance is inhibiting operators' marketing plans". ®

Related stories

LLU dogged by 'significant operational problems'
BT gutted at Ofcom's 'prolonged misbehaviour' allegations
BT DSL price cut undermines LLU competition
Ofcom orders BT price cuts for broadband rivals

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Download alert: Nearly ALL top 100 Android, iOS paid apps hacked
Attack of the Clones? Yeah, but much, much scarier – report
Broadband sellers in the UK are UP TO no good, says Which?
Speedy network claims only apply to 10% of customers
Virgin Media struck dumb by NATIONWIDE packet loss balls-up
Turning it off and on again fixes glitch 12 HOURS LATER
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
Fujitsu CTO: We'll be 3D-printing tech execs in 15 years
Fleshy techie disses network neutrality, helmet-less motorcyclists
Facebook, working on Facebook at Work, works on Facebook. At Work
You don't want your cat or drunk pics at the office
Soz, web devs: Google snatches its Wallet off the table
Killing off web service in 3 months... but app-happy bonkers are fine
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Internet Security Threat Report 2014
An overview and analysis of the year in global threat activity: identify, analyze, and provide commentary on emerging trends in the dynamic threat landscape.