Feeds

GPs have no faith in £6bn NHS IT programme

Not at all keen

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

New hybrid storage solutions

A new poll of doctors has found falling levels of support among GPs and consultants for the NHS's £6.2bn National Programme for IT.

Last year, a similar poll found that 56 per cent of GPs, and 75 per cent of consultants in England supported the NPfIT. In January, this dropped to 21 per cent and 51 per cent respectively. Both surveys were carried out by Medix.

The Guardian, which sponsored the poll along with Computer Weekly, said the poll revealed a collapse in confidence among doctors that threatens the viability of the project. The NPfIT refutes the suggestion, saying that the sample was very small, and the survey highlights negative responses.

A statement from the NPfIT reads: "We know there has been some discontinuity in our clinical engagement. But we have recently adopted a new approach, appointing a number of senior clinicians to lead this engagement work. The Medix survey was conducted in the period after the appointment of these new clinical leads but well before their work has had the chance to penetrate at grass roots level."

The National Audit Office also voiced significant concerns about the programme's flagship electronic referrals project last month. It said lack of engagement with GPs, and low levels of support from medical personnel needed to be address very vigorously.

The latest Medix poll reveals continuing concern over the security of confidential patient information in the new system. Just two per cent of GPs think electronic records will be more secure than the current system.

Many doctors expressed a lack of confidence in the government's ability to make big IT projects work; many more were concerned about patient confidentiality, and increased workload. Others simply said they had not had enough information.

Paul Cundy, chairman of the GPs' committee on IT at the British Medical Association, told The Guardian: "It's increasingly difficult to remain optimistic about NPfIT, given the collapse of enthusiasm for it in the profession. It's fallen over a cliff edge." ®

The Guardian story is here and the survey results are here (word document).

Related stories

Flagship NHS project in danger
NPfIT must win medical hearts and minds
BMA tells doctors: avoid NPfIT's flagship project

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
Drag queens: Oh, don't be so bitchy, Facebook! Let us use our stage names
Handbags at dawn over free content ad network's ID policy
Heavy VPN users are probably pirates, says BBC
And ISPs should nab 'em on our behalf
Italy's High Court orders HP to refund punter for putting Windows on PC
Top beaks slam bundled OS as 'commercial policy of forced distribution'
Former Bitcoin Foundation chair pleads guilty to money-laundering charge
Charlie Shrem plea deal could still get him five YEARS in chokey
NORKS ban Wi-Fi and satellite internet at embassies
Crackdown on tardy diplomatic sysadmins providing accidental unfiltered internet access
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.