Feeds

SBC to axe 13,000 jobs in AT&T merger

Please hang up now

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

US telecoms giant SBC is to axe 13,000 workers in its $16bn (£8.5bn) acquisition of former parent AT&T.

Details of the job cuts were contained in slides accompanying a briefing explaining the deal.< Some 5,100 jobs are to be lost in sales and business and 5,100 are to go at the engineering divisions. Around 2,600 admin jobs - including HR, PR, legal and advertising - are also to be wiped out.

SBC employs 163,000 workers, while AT&T has 47,000. On completion of the job cuts, the enlarged group expects to employ around 197,000 staff. The redundancies will contribute "more than $15bn (£8bn) in synergies with more than 85 per cent coming from cost reductions", the company said.

Execs also reckon they can save more than $500m ($265m) a year by delivering IT synergies, which are "achievable and significant".

The mega-merger between SBC and AT&T was announced on Monday after being agreed at the weekend.

SBC is a local specialist in the US. It has 52m access lines and 5.1m DSL customers with its broadband network covering 77 per cent of its local customer locations. It owns 60 per cent of US mobile firm Cingular which has 49m subscribers.

AT&T works at the other end of the market - it serves almost every member of the Fortune 1000. Its global network covers 50 countries and it has 26 internet data centres, 13 in the US and 13 across the world. It also claims the "world's premier communications research organization, AT&T Labs".

Edward Whitacre, SBC chairman and chief exec, who will lead the new company, said: "The communications industry is undergoing a profound transformation as it transitions to unified, IP-based networks capable of delivering a host of integrated services.

"To manage this evolution, customers need a partner with the resources to provide new service platforms and product sets, while maintaining world-class reliability and security. This merger creates that company."

He promised the new company would regain America's lead in communications. ®

Related stories

SBC rings AT&T for $16bn mega-merger
HP and SBC pledge to service you together
AT&T to deploy WiMAX in 2006

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Microsoft EU warns: If you have ties to the US, Feds can get your data
European corps can't afford to get complacent while American Big Biz battles Uncle Sam
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.