Feeds

SBC rings AT&T for $16bn mega-merger

Talking telephone numbers...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

SBC is buying former parent AT&T for $16bn in cash and shares. AT&T, or Ma Bell, was started in 1875 by Alexander Graham Bell.

AT&T shareholders will get 0.77942 SBC shares for every AT&T share held and a special dividend of $1.30 per share. The deal was agreed by directors yesterday.

SBC is a local specialist in the US. It has 52 million access lines and 5.1m DSL customers. Its broadband network covers 77 per cent of its local customer locations. It owns 60 per cent of US mobile firm Cingular which has 49m subscribers.

AT&T works at the other end of the market - it serves almost every member of the Fortune 1000. Its global network covers 50 countries and it has 26 internet data centers, 13 in the US and 13 across the world. It also claims the "world's premier communications research organization, AT&T Labs"

Edward Whitacre, SBC chairman and chief executive officer, who will lead the new company, said: "The communications industry is undergoing a profound transformation as it transitions to unified, IP-based networks capable of delivering a host of integrated services. To manage this evolution, customers need a partner with the resources to provide new service platforms and product sets, while maintaining world-class reliability and security. This merger creates that company." He promised the new company would regain America's lead in communications.

SBC expects the merger to slow revenue growth in the short term but have a positive impact by 2007. Opportunities include more wireless sales in the enterprise market and the chance to take AT&T IP services, traditionally sold to enterprises, to smaller business and residential customers.

AT&T has about $6bn in debt and SBC has $26bn, excluding Cingular Wireless.

Whitacre will serve as chairman and CEO of the new firm. David Dorman, AT&T chief executive, becomes president of the new firm. No decision has been made on what the firm will be called.

Press release available here. ®

Related stories

HP and SBC pledge to service you together
AT&T to deploy WiMAX in 2006
SBC plans über-network

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Facebook, Google and Instagram 'worse than drugs' says Miley Cyrus
Italian boffins agree with popette's theory that haters are the real wrecking balls
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
Facebook to let stalkers unearth buried posts with mobe search
Prepare to HAUNT your pal's back catalogue
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.