Feeds

Gio debt demands pulled

ISP owes NTL cash too

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Wescot Credit Services Ltd is no longer collecting money on behalf of troubled ISP Gio Internet.

The debt collection agency had sent out letters before Christmas demanding cash it said was owed to Gio Internet.

But the Hull-based firm was flooded with complaints from people who disputed the demands - some of which ran to hundreds of pounds.

One of those who received the bill told us: "We have recently been sent a bill for £319.80 from Wescot Credit Services Ltd saying we owe Gio Internet this money for the use of them providing us with the internet service.

"We have never heard of this company and have only ever used AOL for our internet service use, we have only been on the internet for about a year and Wescot is stating the bill is for internet service in 2002."

Another told us: "Having received this extortionate bill for £340 from a debt collection company on behalf of Gio I hit the roof. I tried to contact them but to no avail. I've been advised to contact them via email and to ignore any demands for payment since they may not be legitimate."

As a result of a "significant number of enquiries" and complaints like these, Wescot has now written another letter advising "that we have now returned all Gio Internet accounts back to our client and Wescot is no longer acting in respect of this matter".

However, it's emerged that Wescot wasn't acting on behalf of Gio directly, but cableco NTL, which is owed cash by Gio for wholesale dial-up services.

A spokesman for NTL confirmed that the cableco was working with Gio to reclaim the cash but declined to say how much money it is owed. This is on top of the £220,000 that NetServices Ltd claims it is owed by Gio for broadband services. Gio disputes this and the matter is currently in the hands of lawyers.

Part of the chaos concerning the involvement of Wescot appears to stem from incomplete records of customer accounts and billing transactions.

Gio Internet MD Charles Holland said he believes Gio is owed up to £1.3m. However, due to incomplete records there is no way of knowing - at the moment at least - exactly how much money is owed. ®

Related stories

Gio Internet sends in the debt collectors
No winding-up order for Gio Internet
NetServices slams Gio Internet in bill dispute

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
Time Warner Cable customers SQUEAL as US network goes offline
A rude awakening: North Americans greeted with outage drama
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
BT customers face broadband and landline price hikes
Poor punters won't be affected, telecoms giant claims
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
EE plonks 4G in UK Prime Minister's backyard
OK, his constituency. Brace yourself for EXTRA #selfies
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.