Feeds

Oracle plots PeopleSoft board takeover

PeopleSoft likes board just the way it is

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

New hybrid storage solutions

Oracle has put forth a list of four directors it will try and have nominated to PeopleSoft's board, as part of its ongoing bid to acquire the software maker.

With a majority of PeopleSoft investors tendering their shares to Oracle in favor of the acquisition, Oracle is now looking to put even more pressure on its target. The ultimate goal of getting the pro-Oracle directors on PeopleSoft's board would be to remove an anti-takeover poison pill provision that would significantly raise the acquisition amount Oracle would have to pay for PeopleSoft. Oracle has said it will not go forth with the takeover with the poison pill in place.

"We have notified the PeopleSoft board of our intention to run an alternative slate of directors at the 2005 annual meeting," said Jeff Henley, chairman at Oracle. "We believe that the current board of PeopleSoft is not acting in the best interests of stockholders and that a large majority of those stockholders are in favor of a change."

The four directors proposed by Oracle are Duke Bristow, a director at Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Landec Corp.; Roger Noall, director of Alleghany Corp.; Laurence Paul, director of Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp. and Biovail Corp. and Artur Raviv, a finance professor at Northwestern University.

Not surprisingly, PeopleSoft was unmoved by Oracle's tactics.

"Based on the numerous conversations we have had with the Company's largest stockholders, our Board is convinced that a majority of our stockholders agree with us that Oracle's $24 offer substantially undervalues PeopleSoft," the company said. "We believe that Oracle has nominated this slate to allow Oracle to purchase PeopleSoft for an inadequate price that does not reflect the Company's real value." ®

Related stories

Oracle must wait for poison pill decision
PeopleSoft holds firm
It's War! - PeopleSoft investors side with Oracle

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
'Windows 9' LEAK: Microsoft's playing catchup with Linux
Multiple desktops and live tiles in restored Start button star in new vids
Not appy with your Chromebook? Well now it can run Android apps
Google offers beta of tricky OS-inside-OS tech
New 'Cosmos' browser surfs the net by TXT alone
No data plan? No WiFi? No worries ... except sluggish download speed
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
NHS grows a NoSQL backbone and rips out its Oracle Spine
Open source? In the government? Ha ha! What, wait ...?
Google extends app refund window to two hours
You now have 120 minutes to finish that game instead of 15
Intel: Hey, enterprises, drop everything and DO HADOOP
Big Data analytics projected to run on more servers than any other app
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.