Feeds

MS extends IP protection to hoi polloi

Ammo for fight against open source

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Microsoft is to extend its intellectual property (IP) protection to all licensed users of the bulk of its software. Previously the IP indemnification was only available to volume licensees, but now the company says it will protect all its users in the event of disputes arising over patents, copyright, trade secrets and trademarks. It has also lifted the monetary cap on the guarantee.

The software giant says the move is designed to give customers peace of mind when using Microsoft products, but it has also used the announcement as an opportunity to attack its open source competitors. It warns that few other companies, including big players like HP, Novell and IBM, offer similarly strong protection.

In an FAQ on its website, the company states:

Microsoft recognizes that some people are comparing the indemnification or IP warranty offers that companies like IBM, HP, Novell and Red Hat are making for their Linux products, and we encourage them to do so. The level of protection offered by each company varies significantly.

and

Red Hat's intellectual property warranty makes no promise to cover a customer's legal expenses, which, according to a recent paper by Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood LLP, "An Indemnity Primer for IT Consumers," can be between $500,000 and $4 million alone -- even before a finding of fault.

A report from analyst house Yankee Group provides some support for Microsoft's position. It states that while owners of proprietary software are protected from IP disputes, "indemnification in the Linux and open source world is a very iffy proposition" because of the difficulties of guaranteeing non standard code.

Indeed: even Microsoft's extended IP protection has its limits. Microsoft says that in embedded industry or task-specific software, where distributors have permission to alter the code, it cannot offer the same IP protection.

The Yankee report's authors do acknowledge that the chances are remote that a company will be the target of a third-party lawsuit, like SCO's efforts against IBM, DaimlerChrysler and AutoZone: "It’s about the same chance that the average taxpayer gets audited by the Internal Revenue Service", it says. ®

Related link

The press release from Microsoft.

Related stories

Whatdya mean, free software?
McNealy: Microsoft needs Sun to beat IBM and Red Hat
Neutered SCO no longer on the offensive

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week
Rebranded OS reportedly set to be flung open by Redmond
'In... 15 feet... you will be HIT BY A TRAIN' Google patents the SPLAT-NAV
Alert system tips oblivious phone junkies to oncoming traffic
Apple: SO sorry for the iOS 8.0.1 UPDATE BUNGLE HORROR
Apple kills 'upgrade'. Hey, Microsoft. You sure you want to be like these guys?
SMASH the Bash bug! Red Hat, Apple scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
'Google is NOT the gatekeeper to the web, as some claim'
Plus: 'Pretty sure iOS 8.0.2 will just turn the iPhone into a fax machine'
ARM gives Internet of Things a piece of its mind – the Cortex-M7
32-bit core packs some DSP for VIP IoT CPU LOL
'People have forgotten just how late the first iPhone arrived ...'
Plus: 'Google's IDEALISM is an injudicious justification for inappropriate biz practices'
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.