Feeds

Transmeta loss widens as revenues miss target

But big licensing deal in the wings

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Transmeta yesterday restated its Q2 loss narrowing the extent to which its Q3 losses, also reported yesterday, expanded beyond the previous quarter's figure and the company missed its revenue forecast.

In the three months to 24 September 2004, Transmeta lost $27.5m (16 cents a share). Some $5.8m of that were down to charged arising from an inventory adjustment. Similar adjustments - the company ordered too much package substrate materials - added $1.3m to Q2's $25.5m loss, taking it to the restated figure of $26.8m (15 cents a share).

The widening loss came despite a 17 per cent sequential increase in revenues, rising from Q2's $6m to Q3's $7m. That's still below the $8-8.7m the company forecast after announcing its Q2 figures. Q3's sales were split $3.3m:$3.7m, product:licensing/service revenue.

The latter looks to be a source of hope for the company: it announced an unnamed "multi-billion dollar semiconductor company" has formally said it intends to license Transmeta's LongRun 2 power-preservation technology. The deal is expected to be signed this quarter.

Product sales declined sequentially, Transmeta said, but are not expected to fall further during Q4. Licensing, on the other hand, looks set to contribute at least $6.3m to Q4's bottom line. It said its loss will shrink down to the 10-12 cents a share range, again incorporating inventory adjustment charges, on revenues between $9.8m and $10.3m.

Company CFO Mark Kent said a $16m licensing deal already signed with IBM has been restructured to allow Transmeta to pay the company $4m a quarter for the next four quarters rather than cough up the lump sum by the end of Q4, the better to ease its cashflow. ®

Related stories

Transmeta sales grow as losses mount
Transmeta: 2GHz Efficeon to offer SSE 3 support
Transmeta ships 90nm Efficeon
Orion delivers first 'personal cluster' workstation
Transmeta shows working 1.6GHz 90nm Efficeon

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.