Feeds

Falling prices hit COLT profits

It's got a plan, a cunning plan...

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

COLT Telecom reduced losses for the three months ended 30 September 2004 and increased turnover seven per cent to £303.7m. Losses fell 11 per cent from £35.7m to £31.8m.

But Ebitda (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) fell 23 per cent from £43.3m to £33.4m.

Chairman Barry Bateman said the underlying financial position was strong and losses were falling. "During the third quarter COLT continued to grow revenues and margins were broadly in line with the second quarter. However, price erosion across a number of products and pressure on costs combined to lead to a disappointing decline in EBITDA."

Chief executive Jean-Yves Charlier said: " the revenue mix was not what it needs to be and we continue to be challenged by the market environment and by pressures on our cost base. We have taken action to strengthen our senior management team in sales and marketing as well as in our key markets of France and the UK. Furthermore, after a strategy review, we are implementing an enhanced set of strategic initiatives - "Future in Focus" - designed to re-establish the company as an innovator and as one of the top three players in each of the metropolitan markets in which it operates across Europe."

Future in Focus is the company's plan to speed up revenue growth, deliver a profit, re-establish a reputation as an innovator and make COLT a top three player in each of its metropolitan markets in Europe. This will be achieved by improving sales from its 32 metropolitan networks, providing better IP products for SME market and ethernet and IP products for enterprises and simplify the business to reduce costs.

More details on COLT's strategic review here. ®

Related stories

BT 'unlikely' to be broken up
Make BT more transparent, say rival telcos
Colt gets new MD

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.