Feeds

OK, so Ellison is not a sociopath...

More like Genghis Khan

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Craig Conway, the ex-boss of PeopleSoft, admitted yesterday that he may have over-reacted to the attempted takeover of his firm by Oracle.

He acknowledged that he described Oracle as a “sociopathic company” but denied describing Oracle’s boss Larry Ellison as a sociopath. He told a court in Delaware that he believed the bid was an attempt to lure PeopleSoft customers away rather than a real bid for the company. Oracle has taken PeopleSoft to court to try and remove “poison pill” arrangements the firm has put in place to try and prevent the takeover.

Conway, an ex-Oracle employee, described Ellison as Genghis Khan, according to AP, but said his former boss used to welcome the comparison.

Internal Oracle emails seem to support the claim that Oracle was using the bid to undermine PeopleSoft customers. An email from Oracle marketing director Mark Jarvis seen by news.com said: “use this news in order to create FUD with prospects and customers alike” - FUD is fear, uncertainty and doubt. Another email, after the bid had been made public, said Oracle had “successfully spread enough FUD along with our own capabilities to have a good average shot at winning”.

Conway was accused of making misleading comments to analysts about the deal. He accepted he could have been more guarded in his comments but denied deliberately lying.

A PeopleSoft board member earlier suggested to the court that the firm was more receptive to a possible take-over if the price was right. Oracle is currently offering $7.7bn for the firm.

The PeopleSoft board of directors “terminated” Conway’s employment due to a loss in confidence in his ability to run the firm. Company founder Dave Duffield was appointed CEO in his place.

Meanwhile European Competition Commissioner Mario Monti announced that his investigation into the merger would restart with the intention of coming to a decision by the time he stands down at the end of this month. The Commission now hopes to report by 9 November, according to sources quoted by Reuters. The US Department of Justice is no longer opposed to the merger - it originally took court action on concerns that the takeover would leave just two providers of enterprise software. After losing the initial case the DOJ has decided not to appeal. ®

Related stories

Oracle v. Peoplesoft: Roundup
Oracle asks court to remove PeopleSoft poison pills
Peoplesoft sacks Craig Conway
Oracle v. Peoplesoft: the joke is on...

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week
Rebranded OS reportedly set to be flung open by Redmond
'In... 15 feet... you will be HIT BY A TRAIN' Google patents the SPLAT-NAV
Alert system tips oblivious phone junkies to oncoming traffic
Apple: SO sorry for the iOS 8.0.1 UPDATE BUNGLE HORROR
Apple kills 'upgrade'. Hey, Microsoft. You sure you want to be like these guys?
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
ARM gives Internet of Things a piece of its mind – the Cortex-M7
32-bit core packs some DSP for VIP IoT CPU LOL
Lotus Notes inventor Ozzie invents app to talk to people on your phone
Imagine that. Startup floats with voice collab app for Win iPhone
'Google is NOT the gatekeeper to the web, as some claim'
Plus: 'Pretty sure iOS 8.0.2 will just turn the iPhone into a fax machine'
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.