Feeds

NetApp files away big Q1 gain

Storage keeps on selling

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Shares of Network Appliance jumped more than 11 percent during Wednesday's trading after the storage maker reported a robust 38 percent rise in first quarter revenue.

On Tuesday, NetApp posted revenue of $358m - a figure well ahead of the $261m posted in the same period last year. Income also surged, rising 73 percent to $47m up from $27m last year. The company's results back up strong recent performances from EMC and Dell to show overall strength in the storage market.

"NetApp demonstrated exceptional execution, a strong balance sheet, and continued cash generation during the quarter," said NetApp CEO Dan Warmenhoven. "Our focus is on expanding our market share and our results demonstrate that the market is continuing to move toward us."

While NetApp barely beat analysts' first quarter expectations, it provided a rosy outlook for the coming quarter which appeared to please investors. The vendor is looking for second quarter revenue to come in 4 percent to 6 percent higher than the Q1 total on the back of solid gains in Asia. Shares of NetApp hit as high as $19.50 during today's trading and held the gains, as the stock price sat at $19.44 just ahead of the market close.

NetApp has specialized in IP-based storage systems and dominated the market for NAS (network attached storage) boxes. Over the past couple of years, it has been trying to produce higher-end kit that can compete better against the Fibre Channel-based systems sold by EMC and others.

EMC posted a 33 percent revenue gain in its most recent quarter and partner Dell showed 60 percent growth. Both vendors helped promote the notion that a slump affecting large software sellers has not carried over to the hardware market. HP, however, deadened some of this excitement with dismal storage results in its third quarter, although HP's woes had more to do with operational issues than a general slowdown in hardware spending.

NetApp closed a number of deals during its first quarter, including shipments to Audi AG, Canon, Catholic Healthcare West, China Everbright Bank, Ciena, City of Concord and ConocoPhillips. ®

Related stories

King Arthur and his Bytes of the Round Table
Veritas cleans up financials
EMC confirms low-end storage charge
Slinging disks, NetApp booms in Q3

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
VMware's tool to harden virtual networks: a spreadsheet
NSX security guide lands in intriguing format
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.