Feeds

SEC to examine Playboy for boobs

Larry, Sergey grace the glossy

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Business security measures using SSL

The Securities and Exchange Commission will be examining the September issue of Playboy even more closely than normal. The reason? The appearance of a pair of boobs at a particularly sensitive time.

The boobs in question are Google Inc. founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, who have punctuated the company's mandatory pre-IPO period with an extensive interview with the monthly. The interview itself was conducted on 22 April, at the end of a Spring publicity campaign. Google filed its initial public offering a week later.

"This interview is going to cause regulatory concern," a former SEC attorney tells USA Today. "There could be consequences." Columnist John C Dvorak adds, "You cannot live in and around Silicon Valley and not know you cannot do this stuff. I think many of these stunts are perhaps on purpose," he says, a theme echoed on bulletin boards. [Er - nice beaver, John].

The concerns maybe premature. SEC is only likely to get involved if the statements differ from public filings. As the Washington Post noted in May, Google hadn't exactly been reticent after filing its Coca Cola Jingle. But there's nothing new here you haven't heard many times before.

Simply the obligatory references to Rollerblades and Segways, random toys, not being evil, helping school children in Cambodia (by giving them Gmail accounts) and connecting Google "to your mind". We learn that Larry Page "wore shoes" throughout the interview and that at one point he vowed, oddly, "we will not hold your email hostage." He suggests that Google-gamers who "optimize" their results for the search engine may eventually find "realize that it's more efficient just to pay to promote their things, if that's what they want to do."

We know this, because leaving nothing to chance, Google has reprinted the entire Playboy interview on its IPO website, with the following warning

Risk Factors—If our involvement in a September 2004 magazine article about Google were held to be in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, we could be required to repurchase securities sold in this offering. You should rely only on statements made in this prospectus in determining whether to purchase our shares for certain information in the following article that has been modified or updated.

Due diligence? They've heard of it.®

Related Stories

Google! Licenses! Yahoo's! Secret! Sauce!
Google IPO 'hangs in the balance'
Google goes gimpy from MyDoom infection
Google must buy back buddy stock
Google demotes Coca Cola jingle
Google decides banner ads, skyscrapers are not evil
Google files Coca Cola jingle with SEC

Website security in corporate America

More from The Register

next story
Oi, London thief. We KNOW what you're doing - our PRECRIME system warned us
Aye, shipmate, it be just like that Minority Report
WRISTJOB LOVE BONANZA: justWatch sex app promises blind date hookups
Mankind shuffles into the future, five fingers at a time
Apple's Mr Havisham: Tim Cook says dead Steve Jobs' office has remained untouched
'I literally think about him every day' says biz baron's old friend
Cops apologise for leaving EXPLOSIVES in suitcase at airport
'Canine training exercise' SNAFU sees woman take home booming baggage
Every billionaire needs a PANZER TANK, right? STOP THERE, Paul Allen
Angry Microsoftie hauls auctioneers to court over stalled Pzkw. IV 'deal'
Flaming drone batteries ground commercial flight before takeoff
Passenger had Something To Declare, instead fiddled while plane burned
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.