Feeds

Google must buy back buddy stock

Tell Sid: he can't keep those shares

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Google was lauded for bypassing institutional cronyism when it opted for an auction process for its initial public stock offering. But a different kind of cronyism has landed it in breach of financial regulations.

Google has been obliged to buy back $28.8m worth of stock and options offered to employees, contractors and buddies after belatedly discovering it had failed to register the giveaways, thus breaching IPO regulations in 18 states, including New York, California and Texas. Google granted the shares to 1,105 employees or contractors, and 301 others. The recission, as it's known, could cost the company almost $26m.

There's a problem, however. Two of the largest shareholders have refused Google's buyback price of 20 per cent. Some of the options were granted for as little as 30 cents, while the IPO is priced at between $108 and $135, and of course, stockholders are expected to make a further killing when the auction process begins.

Google designed the auction process to bypass the pre-flotation sweeteners that gave the dot.com IPO era a bad name. Venture capitalists who funded the bust-to-begin-with stocks offered generous helpings to financial institutions involved in the IPO process, and to their CEO pals, ensuring they cashed in when the stock started trading. The auction process was intended to be more equitable and more appealing to small investors. However in a CBS poll, over 90 per cent of small investors said they'd give the company a pass.

"My take is Google doing the auction (for the little guy) and then pricing shares so outrageously is like a veteran rock group saying they're going on tour for the fans and the cheapest tickets are $500. A lot of fans will skip it and the average investor will be priced out," complained one.

It's not the first instance of the bright young things at Google failing to hand in their homework correctly. The company failed to realize that Gmail trademark was already registered in 80 countries and is being sued by the franchise that looks after a popular children's book, the Googles. Both the domain registration and website Googles.com predated the search engine by several months. ®

Related stories

Google prices IPO, names ticker
Google sued by Planet Goo
Google prices IPO, names ticker
Google demotes Coca Cola jingle
Google's public-auction IPO: smart move?

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
4chan outraged by Emma Watson nudie photo leak SCAM
In the immortal words of Shaggy, it wasn't me us ... amirite?
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.