Feeds

BT Retail cuts cost of DSL, caps users

Oh well

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

BT has confirmed it is to cut the cost of its broadband products in a bid to halt falling market share.

In doing so, the UK's dominant fixed-line telco is also capping all of its ADSL services in a move that might make some of its customers think twice before signing up to BT's broadband service.

Both of BT's 512k services now have a 15GB a month cap, with its 1Mb service lumbered with a 30GB limit.

BT says that the "vast majority" of people will be unaffected by the cap and that only between 3-5 per cent of its punters are bandwidth hogs. But BT's decision to cap all customers because of a minority who are abusing the service has already drawn criticism from rivals.

An AOL UK spokesman told us: "The capping of services causes concern among consumers about limits on usage and possible surcharges. We believe that most people will prefer the comfort of flat-rate Internet access."

And on the issue of price, there are also suggestions that BT has missed a trick. While BT has cut the cost of its wires-only, frill-less BT Broadband (512k) package, BT Yahoo! Broadband 512k and BT Yahoo! Broadband 1Mb, the monthly charge for its capped BT Broadband Basic service remains fixed at £19.99 a month.

BT's reluctance to cut the monthly fee of its entry level DSL product comes as research shows that both its share of the UK's DSL market - and its share of new customers - is shrinking. What's more, research shows that the biggest growth areas for DSL are aggressively-priced, entry-level products such as Wanadoo's £17.99 a month service.

Despite this, BT reckons its price cuts are competitive and give customers the "best ever value broadband from a name you can trust".

BT's new prices, which come into effect from 1 July, are as follows:

BT Broadband (512k) - down from £27 per month to £24.99. BT Yahoo! Broadband 512k - down from £29.99 per month to £26.99. BT Yahoo! Broadband 1Mb - down from £40.99 per month to £29.99. BT Broadband Basic (512k) - remains at £19.99 per month but with free modem and connection. ®

Related stories

BT's DSL market share carries on falling
BT to cut broadband prices for punters
Make BT more transparent, say rival telcos

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
Consumers agree to give up first-born child for free Wi-Fi – survey
This Herod network's ace – but crap reception in bullrushes
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
Sea-Me-We 5 construction starts
New sub cable to go live 2016
New EU digi-commish struggles with concepts of net neutrality
Oettinger all about the infrastructure – but not big on substance
EE coughs to BROKEN data usage metrics BLUNDER that short-changes customers
Carrier apologises for 'inflated' measurements cockup
Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS
The others guys are being mean so therefore ... monopoly all good, yeah?
Surprise: if you work from home you need the Internet
Buffer-rage sends Aussies out to experience road rage
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.