Feeds

Storage users love the press and a good brand

Style over substance, price and quality

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

Storage customers will apparently do as they are told, favoring media and analyst recommendations and branding over price and performance when evaluating gear, according to a recent study.

The SNIA (Storage Network Industry Association) Europe trade group conducted a survey of storage users in the UK, France and Germany and found that a "vendor's visibility is one of the main influencing factors in purchase decision-making." Users respond to a vendor that comes off well in press and analyst reports. In fact, 72 percent of the users surveyed said they saw press coverage as either a high or medium concern when buying storage products. Out of that figure, 42 percent of the users saw media coverage as a high-ranking criteria compared to only 28 percent that saw price as a high-priority.

With that in mind, The Register invites you to try our new line of high-priced but also high-end SAN (storage area network) hardware. Simply put - it's fantastic. Honest.

What else did SNIA discover?

"Analyst reports proved influential in the decision-making process, far higher than product performance or return on investment (ROI)," the group said.

UK users tended to place a higher priority on price, while Germans placed the least importance on price and the French users fell in the middle.

Given this information, SNIA came up with one of the oddest conclusions from its own study.

"With the advent of more advanced storage networking solutions and industry legislation, customers are becoming more astute," said Paul Talbut, chairman of SNIA Europe.

While Talbut's assessment rightfully points to the prominent role the press plays in user astutement, we can't help but wonder if users wouldn't be seen as more astute if they valued price and performance over our prose/drivel. Register readers no doubt make up the majority of those who do in fact value price/performance over press and analyst evaluations. We would expect nothing less. Try to help out your non-Register reading friends.

For the storage vendors out there, we think the study speaks for itself. Get on with the impressing. ®

Related stories

Seagate gets litigious with small hard drive rival
EMC ups storage software market share
EMC measures ADIC for tape rescue
Veritas cleans up financials
Seagate unveils 'tiny to terabyte' hard drives

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
Pay to play: The hidden cost of software defined everything
Enter credit card details if you want that system you bought to actually be useful
HP busts out new ProLiant Gen9 servers
Think those are cool? Wait till you get a load of our racks
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Community chest: Storage firms need to pay open-source debts
Samba implementation? Time to get some devs on the job
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.