Feeds

EMC measures ADIC for tape rescue

StorageTek laughs off lack of culture

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Boost IT visibility and business value

EMC caused a stir last week when it agreed to resell tape libraries from ADIC. First and foremost, there was some industry shock to see EMC pick up tape in such full force after all these years extolling the virtue of disk. Secondly, EMC drew harsh words from ADIC's tape rival StorageTek.

Next month, EMC will begin selling ADIC's Scalar tape libraries. Being a politically correct firm, ADIC has also agreed to offer EMC's Clariion systems as part of its Pathlight VX combination tape/disk offering.

Why the sudden tape embrace?

Well, EMC claims that low-cost tape will play a key role in its ILM (Information Life cycle Management) plans. Customers were apparently asking for a non-disk option to round out their tiered storage architectures. EMC has sold a Quantum tape system as part of a larger storage package but did not offer standalone libraries , until it reached terms with ADIC. That's mostly because EMC executives spent a lot of their time emphasizing tape's demise in favor of ever-cheaper, faster disk.

Putting the tape-hating in the past, EMC will now resell the Scalar 24, Scalar 100, Scalar i2000 and Scalar 10K models with LTO tape drives. ADIC, however, will actually ship the systems to EMC customers and handle support.

Self-proclaimed ILM pioneer StorageTek found EMC's tape reversal more than amusing. "Thank you EMC - you have now endorsed our strategy of classifying, managing and moving information across a foundation of tiered storage based upon its purpose and value - which we call enterprise information lifecycle management," said Mark Ward, StorageTek's vice president and general manager, of Information Lifecycle Management Solutions Group. "With this announcement, EMC recognizes that tape is an essential element to this strategy, and sophisticated customers will consider StorageTek for their tape libraries."

Is there anything finer than a vendor elevating the tape drive discussion to a debate over customer sophistication? ®

Related stories

EMC squares up for on-target year
EMC puts voodoo in new software biz
EMC retools archiving software
StorageTek gives early look at tape library behemoth

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Object storage bods Exablox: RAID is dead, baby. RAID is dead
Bring your own disks to its object appliances
Nimble's latest mutants GORGE themselves on unlucky forerunners
Crossing Sandy Bridges without stopping for breath
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.