Feeds

Microsoft's war on GPL dealt patent setback

FAT not a banker

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Microsoft has two goals from its patent licensing program. One is to create a new, stable revenue stream to complement its ageing cash cows, Windows and Office. Patent royalties could provide an attractive income if the company succumbs to market economics, and is forced to lower its prices to compete with cheaper free software. The other goal - although it may simply be fortuitous collateral damage from Redmond's point of view - is to make writing free software illegal. Or if not illegal, then so fraught with legal uncertainties that developers gravitate away from the GPL.

GPL developers shy away from patent minefields citing two reasons. Many say patents are incompatible with the license while others cite more practical concerns: saying that the prospect of expensive legal battles is a risk small developers can't take. So when Microsoft hired Marshall Phelps, the IBM executive and lawyer responsible for building Big Blue's royalty income from zero into a multi-billion dollar business, community leaders sat up and took notice.

Last December Microsoft announced its first-ever patent royalty program. Camera and PDA manufacturers were invited to pay Redmond a peppercorn royalty for use of the FAT file system, which they'd previously used for free. But now that first tentative foray has been dealt a setback, as the US Patent Office is to open an investigation into the validity of Microsoft's FAT patent (renewed in 1996).

Prior art from Xerox and (ironically) IBM submitted by the Public Patent Foundation raises "a substantial new question of patentability" according to the USPTO. Although the PPF points out that patents are rejected in about 70 per cent of re-examinations, it cautions that this is just the first step in the process. And, of course, there are plenty more patents where FAT came from.

Still, it's an indication that the software libre community doesn't just spend its time congratulating itself, and can organize to repel clear and present danger. ®

External links

Public Patent Foundation
FAT File System Technology and Patent License [Microsoft] How smart is reverse engineering .NET?

Related stories

Patent Office asked to review Microsoft FAT patent
Microsoft FAT patents could be re-opened
Microsoft aiming IBM-scale patent program at Linux?
Eolas' web patent nullified
Microsoft patents .Everything

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Preview redux: Microsoft ships new Windows 10 build with 7,000 changes
Latest bleeding-edge bits borrow Action Center from Windows Phone
Google opens Inbox – email for people too thick to handle email
Print this article out and give it to someone tech-y if you get stuck
Microsoft promises Windows 10 will mean two-factor auth for all
Sneak peek at security features Redmond's baking into new OS
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Google+ goes TITSUP. But WHO knew? How long? Anyone ... Hello ...
Wobbly Gmail, Contacts, Calendar on the other hand ...
DEATH by PowerPoint: Microsoft warns of 0-day attack hidden in slides
Might put out patch in update, might chuck it out sooner
Redmond top man Satya Nadella: 'Microsoft LOVES Linux'
Open-source 'love' fairly runneth over at cloud event
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.