Feeds

PalmOne shares soar on Dell purchase rumour

What's in it for the vendor?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Boost IT visibility and business value

PalmOne's shares jumped 12.5 per cent yesterday to $18.21 on the back of rumours that the company has become a Dell acquisition target.

It's certainly a possible course of action - Dell has the funds and the stock to make it happen. That said, it's not been a particularly acquisitive company in the past, though Michael Dell has never ruled out the possibility of buying other firms if there's a suitable fit.

Would that apply to PalmOne? Dell certainly has a stake in the PDA business and offers its own Axim series of Windows Mobile-based devices. Before the advent of Axim, back when PalmOne was simply Palm Dell used to sell its machines. Having dropped them to make way for Axim, would Dell now want them back?

Since that time, PalmOne has acquired Handspring, and so now comes with added smart phone expertise, along with the industry connections necessary to operate in that sector. Dell might well have an eye on that part of the business rather than PalmOne's pure-play PDA operation, which could at least be offered as an alternative to the Axim PocketPC line in much the same way it offers Linux alongside Windows.

But the highly vendor-specific nature of the mobile phone market goes totally against Dell's core sell direct model, and if it's really interested in offering Palm OS machines as well as PocketPCs, why doesn't in just license the Palm OS like everyone else - or, rather, partner with a Far Eastern licensee ODM who can make Dell-branded Palm-based PDAs.

That approach works for Axim, and it could easily work for a Palm OS-based product line. All PalmOne really offers a brandname, and Dell already has one of those. Dell, in short, does not need PalmOne, and that fact has to call into question any claim that it's interested in buying the company.

Add to that the fact that world PDA sales are declining, and you have to wonder why Dell would be investing sufficient time and money in the sector to simply for the privilege of selling more devices than HP. ®

Related stories

Review: PalmOne Zire 72
Review: Dell Axim x3i
PalmOne updates consumer PDAs
World PDA shipments plunge
PalmOne, HP slog it out over Euro sales
PDA, smartphone sales rocket in Europe

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
EE accused of silencing customer gripes on social media pages
Hello. HELLO. Can EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE HEAR ME?!
Time Warner Cable customers SQUEAL as US network goes offline
A rude awakening: North Americans greeted with outage drama
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
BT customers face broadband and landline price hikes
Poor punters won't be affected, telecoms giant claims
Broadband slow and expensive? Blame Telstra says CloudFlare
Won't peer, will gouge for Internet transit
prev story

Whitepapers

A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.