Feeds

State senator drafts Google opt-out Bill

No Oogling, please

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Privacy crusader Liz Figueroa, a California State Senator, has introduced legislation to protect users from snooping email providers. It doesn't mention Google by name, but was clearly prompted by the advertising broker's new email service, Gmail.

The move is in the form of an amendment to SB.1822. Few will find much to object to in the bill, which guarantees consumer's the choice of opting-out from advertisements. After the furor broke, Google co-founder Sergey Brin said he would consider such an option as a response. The provision would apply to instant messaging as well as email. Senator Figueroa has a good record of consumer protection, steering through the Do Not Call legislation.

The relevant portion of SB.1822 is as follows:-

Existing law prohibits a person or entity located in California from initiating or advertising in unsolicited commercial e-mail advertisements, as defined, and prohibits a person or entity not located in California from initiating or advertising in unsolicited commercial e-mail advertisements sent to a California e-mail address.

This bill would prohibit a provider of e-mail or instant messaging services, as defined, that serves California customers, from reviewing or evaluating the content of a customer's e-mail or instant messages, except as specified. The bill would permit a provider of e-mail or instant messaging services to review and evaluate the content of a customer's outgoing e-mail or instant messages with the customer's consent, and would permit a provider to review and evaluate the content of incoming e-mail or instant messages only from another subscriber to the same service and only when that subscriber has consented to the procedure.

This section does not prevent a provider of e-mail or instant messaging services to California customers from filtering unsolicited e-mail for removing spam or for managing computer viruses or other malicious programs

The legislation applies only to California, and may not be enough to satisfy privacy advocates concerned about data retention issues. A clumsily-worded Google "privacy policy" - since revised - at first stated that email would be retained even after a user had closed the account. This has since been clarified to explain that backups take some time to delete - a policy in common with other web-based email providers.

Gmail was hurriedly announced on April 1 and became the subject of late-night TV jokes. The reaction, as Electronic Frontier Foundation Brad Templeton, a consultant to Google, confirms, took the company by surprise, a reaction we found much more troubling than the original announcement.

Co-founder Larry Page - who rather unhelpfully, recently fantasised about implanting Google chips in people's brains - refused to rule out cross-linking data collected under Google's search cookie with the Gmail cookie. As Templeton concludes in a long analysis of Gmail, "there are some real issues here to be worried about", there are "real risks"; and "even the irrational fears over the spooky aspect of advertising being associated with email creates [sic] problems that must be addressed". This most private of companies had little comprehension of how much its users valued their own privacy.

Google isn't the first company to beguiled by its own publicity, and it won't be the last. However, as the world's largest private sector data-harvesting operation,it should be more careful, wouldn't you think? As it is, we now have the first legislative attempt to ensure that Google acts as a responsible corporate citizen. ®

Related stories

Google values its own privacy. How does it value yours?
California Senator seeks Google Gmail ban
Germans garotte Google Gmail over privacy
Google's Gmail hits trademark problem
Big Brother nominated for Google Award
Google mail is evil - privacy advocates
Google launches email, takes the Bill Gates defense
Google founder dreams of Google implant in your brain
Google touts stalking service
Google revives discredited Microsoft privacy policy for Friendster clone
You got Google mail report

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.