Feeds

Linux vendors attack Forrester report

Some vulns more equal than others

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

SANS - Survey on application security programs

Analyst Forrester has come under fire from leading Linux distributors for suggesting that Windows and Linux are equally secure.

In a research note published last month entitled Is Linux More Secure Than Windows?, Forrester argues that the perception that Windows is far less secure than Linux is unfair.

In assessing the relative security of open source and proprietary platforms, Forrester looked at factors such as vendors' responsiveness to vulnerabilities, the severity of vulnerabilities and how thoroughly flaws are fixed.

But this analysis is flawed, according to a joint statement by Linux distros Debian, Mandrake, Red Hat, and SUSE issued this week.

"Despite the report's claim to incorporate a qualitative assessment of vendor reactions to serious vulnerabilities, it treats all vulnerabilities as equal, regardless of their risk to users. As a result, the conclusions drawn by Forrester have extremely limited real-world value for customers assessing the practical issue of how quickly serious vulnerabilities get fixed," they said.

The vulnerability data corrected by Forrester is accurate enough, according to Linux distros, it's just Forrester's conclusions they take issue with. They believe Forrester failed to treat open and closed source software the same way.

Forrester's point that closed and open source security are roughly equivalent is in line with those of distinguished academics like Ross Anderson (who is anything but a Redmond lackey). It's also fair to say that how technology is deployed more important than the platform a user chooses from a security perspective.

The four Linux distros helped Forrester create its report. The perceived failure of the analyst to present their case fairly in this instance appears to have provoked an unusually strong rebuke.

Forrester strayed into an area staked out by strongly held, sincere beliefs. It's difficult to strike the right balance in commenting on this area (we speak from experience and have the flames to prove it). If Forrester made a mistake it would seem to be one of drawing sweeping conclusions on security based only on looking at vulnerabilities. The majority of viruses (Windows security public enemy number one), after all, rely on tricking users into running malicious code rather than exploiting a specific vulnerability.

So risk or exposure are better metrics of overall security than vulnerability handling alone. Unfortunately risk is even harded to assess than vulnerability handling. ®

Related Stories

Open and closed security are roughly equivalent
.NET more secure than WebSphere
Security is our biggest ever challenge Gates
IT managers trust Microsoft on security (up to a point)
Human error blamed for most security breaches

Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction

More from The Register

next story
Parent gabfest Mumsnet hit by SSL bug: My heart bleeds, grins hacker
Natter-board tells middle-class Britain to purée its passwords
Samsung Galaxy S5 fingerprint scanner hacked in just 4 DAYS
Sammy's newbie cooked slower than iPhone, also costs more to build
Obama allows NSA to exploit 0-days: report
If the spooks say they need it, they get it
Web data BLEEDOUT: Users to feel the pain as Heartbleed bug revealed
Vendors and ISPs have work to do updating firmware - if it's possible to fix this
Snowden-inspired crypto-email service Lavaboom launches
German service pays tribute to Lavabit
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Call of Duty 'fragged using OpenSSL's Heartbleed exploit'
So it begins ... or maybe not, says one analyst
NSA denies it knew about and USED Heartbleed encryption flaw for TWO YEARS
Agency forgets it exists to protect communications, not just spy on them
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.