Feeds

MSN UK shuts Member Directory over paedo fears

'Preventative measure'

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

MSN UK has shut down its Members Directory over fears, presumably, that it could be used by paedophiles searching for young victims.

This is our assumption, because MSN refused to discuss exactly why it had decided to close the directory which lists its members' details.

Unlike Microsoft's very public closure of its chat rooms last September to protect children from paedophiles, its decision to close its Members Directory has been sneaked out under the carpet.

A message on MSN's Web site reads: "As of 30 March 2004, MSN UK has temporarily closed access to the MSN Member Directory."

Question is, why? We called Microsoft's press office which dusted down the following drawer statement: "While MSN Member Directory does not allow people to directly search for profiles of MSN Members by age for age groups under age 20, it does currently allow searching for MSN user profiles using other criteria, with results that may include people under 20.

"While we have not received any reports of this capability being exploited, MSN has shut down the Member Directory in the UK as a preventative measure, based on that local market's request.

"In the April timeframe, MSN will deliver a global solution that will prevent people from finding profiles of MSN members under age 18, unless they know their direct screen name.

"This will help to further deliver a more secure online experience for children by ensuring that their details cannot be accessed in the MSN Member Directory."

It sounds like MSN is concerned about a personal security loophole that exposes its younger users to unwelcome attention. That's just our guess, mind, since no one at MSN, in the UK or the States would comment. Indeed, no one was able to say what prompted the move, who had "requested" the closure and why. ®

Related story

MSN torches chatrooms
MSN Chat: It's the child protection lobby wot's to blame - LINX
MSN chat stand is 'nothing short of reckless' - Freeserve

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.