NSW bans workplace cyber-snooping

Criminal offence

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

Unauthorised snooping on workers by their employers is to be banned in Australia's New South Wales.

Regulations in the Exposure Bill, due out next month, will make it a criminal offence for an employer to carry out covert surveillance on its staff unless a company can show a "reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing by an employee", AAP reports.

The rules will prohibit the use of technologies including video cameras, email monitoring software and tracking devices in illicit spying. NSW employers will be obliged to be more up-front about monitoring, for example by writing rules into employment contracts.

"The law to date has not provided any guidance when legitimate employer concern crosses the line into unauthorised cyber snooping," Attorney-General Bob Debus told NSW's parliament.

"While some employers argue that this is necessary to protect their legitimate interests, employees expect that their private correspondence, like their private telephone calls or private conversations, should never be the subject of secret monitoring."

Trade unions, which have campaigned on the issue for four years, are delighted.

"This is truly a historic development and a recognition that workers using computers at work have privacy rights," NSW Labor Council secretary John Robertson told AAP. Robertson added the rules would help endure privacy when workers contact their trade union for advice or during disputes.

Employers are likely to be far from pleased. A recent study found that four in five Australian bosses use technology to monitor worker's emails, phone calls and Internet usage.

The UK Information Commissioner announced a code of practice on surveillance in the workplace last year. This requires companies to inform employees if they are monitoring phone calls, emails and Internet use. The Commissioner, Richard Thomas, said the guidelines tried to balance the needs of employers with the rights of employees.

But critics say the Employment Practices Data Protection Code, more than two years in development, is still too vague and does little to safeguard privacy in the workplace. ®

Related stories

Privacy in the workplace is a 'myth'
Anti-email snooping proposals 'stupid'
IT workers expect Big Brother-style snooping at work

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Goog says patch⁵⁰ your Chrome
64-bit browser loads cat vids FIFTEEN PERCENT faster!
Chinese hackers spied on investigators of Flight MH370 - report
Classified data on flight's disappearance pinched
NIST to sysadmins: clean up your SSH mess
Too many keys, too badly managed
Attack flogged through shiny-clicky social media buttons
66,000 users popped by malicious Flash fudging add-on
New twist as rogue antivirus enters death throes
That's not the website you're looking for
ISIS terror fanatics invade Diaspora after Twitter blockade
Nothing we can do to stop them, says decentralized network
prev story


A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.