Feeds

SiS goes PCI Express for Pentium 4, Athlon 64 FX

Sampling now

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

SiS has begun sampling its first PCI Express-based North Bridge chips for AMD's Athlon 64 FX chip and Intel's Pentium 4.

The AMD part is supported by the SiS756 North Bridge. Like the Pentium 4-oriented SiS656 North Bridge, it has been designed to work with the company's SiS965 South Bridge part.

The 756 provides a PCI Express x16 interface for graphics cards, which yields an 8GBps bi-directional data transfer rate - rather higher than AGP 8x's 2.1GBps.

The 656 includes a dual-channel memory controller that can cope with 400MHz DDR SDRAM and 667MHz DDR 2, with support for up to four DIMMs and a 4GB memory ceiling. It also supports HyperThreading.

The SiS965 South Bridge will provide a pair of PCI Express x1 buses as PCI replacements, support for four Serial ATA devices (with RAID 1 0+1 and JBOD) and four ATA-133 devices, Gigabit Ethernet, eight USB 2.0 ports, 7.1 channel AC97 sound.

The SiS656 is expected to ship in motherboards in May, SiS said. It could not say when mobos based on the Athlon 64 FX chipset would become available. ®

Related stories

S3 preps native PCI Express graphics chips
Nvidia unwraps PCI Express graphics chips
ATI is waiting for PCI Express to launch Athlon 64 chipsets

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.