Feeds

No need to panic over IP rights directive

Crying 'Wolf' damages our intellectual freedom

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Letter: The IP Rights Enforcement Directive was passed yesterday by the European Parliament.

This framework for national legislation has caused a huge amount of controversy and speculation as to how it will eventually appear in law in each of the member states, and sparked protest by civil liberties and consumer rights groups. But have they overstated their case?

Adrian McMenamin, the Press Officer of the European Parliamentary Labour Party, certainly thinks so:

Dear Sir,

The American quoted in your article clearly doesn't understand how EU legislation works. It is now a matter for member states of the EU to translate the directive - which is a framework for law, not the law itself - into their national laws. If member states want to crack down on file sharers the directive approved by the European Parliament makes no odds - they can do that anyway. But given that the directive does not *require* member states to come down hard on individuals swapping files on a small scale there are no grounds for implying that, if they do, it is because of this directive - it will entirely be a matter for member states and their parliaments.

Those arguing against this directive have used scare tactics throughout and as a result have consistently alienated the vast majority of legislators in the European Parliament. Intellectual freedom is a valuable thing and its cause is being damaged by people who constantly cry wolf.

Britain has had laws very similar to those required by the directive for some years now and I do not see police raiding the homes of file sharers on a regular basis and nor do I see the development of OSS being halted - I should know, I have written several Linux kernel modules. Claims that the DMCA is coming to Europe are ridiculous.

A lot of those who opposed this directive did so because they do not believe in any sort of prohibitive intellectual property protection. It's a legitimate argument (though not one I support) but it has been tarnished by their decision to try to scare the living daylights out of people with talk of a coming "police state".

Yours sincerely,

Adrian McMenamin
Press Officer,
European Parliamentary Labour Party
®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Cops apologise for leaving EXPLOSIVES in suitcase at airport
'Canine training exercise' SNAFU sees woman take home booming baggage
Apple's Mr Havisham: Tim Cook says dead Steve Jobs' office has remained untouched
'I literally think about him every day' says biz baron's old friend
Flaming drone batteries ground commercial flight before takeoff
Passenger had Something To Declare, instead fiddled while plane burned
Every billionaire needs a PANZER TANK, right? STOP THERE, Paul Allen
Angry Microsoftie hauls auctioneers to court over stalled Pzkw. IV 'deal'
Jony Ive: Apple iWatch will SCREW UP Switzerland's economy
Apple's chief designer forgot one crucial point about overpriced bling
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.