Feeds

Server vendors cheer strong Q4

Up in all the right places

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Boost IT visibility and business value

The worldwide server market surged in the fourth quarter with system sales from the low to high-end all increasing for the first time since 2001, according to researcher IDC.

Overall, server revenue increased 11.4 percent to $13.7 billion in the period. This came as unit shipments jumped 22 percent year-on-year. Low-end, midrange and high-end sales all grew during the quarter for the first time since the economic downturn began in 2001, IDC said, but the low-end growth continued to be the most dramatic.

"Volume server capabilities are driving into several tiers of the computing infrastructure," said Vernon Turner, group vice president of IDC's worldwide server group. "It shows that high-end server technology has cascaded to this market, and that infrastructure is being augmented by industry standards and IT is reaping the benefits."

IBM held onto its position as the big daddy of the server realm. Big Blue's server revenue rose 17.7 percent in the fourth quarter, and it captured 37.9 percent of the market. HP increased revenue 9.4 percent to take 25.8 percent of the market, while Sun's revenue dropped 1.7 percent, leaving it with 10.4 percent market share. Dell followed with 8.6 percent of the market on 19 percent revenue growth, and Fujitsu/Fujitsu-Siemens rounded out the top five, posting the strongest revenue growth - 31.3 percent - and 5.4 percent market share.

Linux servers continued to be the hottest items in the server business. Linux server revenue surged 63.1 percent to $960 million. The Windows server market remained strong but only grew revenue 16.1 percent to $3.9 billion.

Unix serves also grew during the quarter. Total Unix revenue topped out at $5.1 billion on 0.8 percent growth. It was a mixed story for Sun in this segment. The company ended up third in overall revenue behind IBM and HP but managed to increase shipments by 18.2 percent. This was the strongest year-on-year growth for any vendor.

For the full year, vendors moved $46 billion worth of servers. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Docker kicks KVM's butt in IBM tests
Big Blue finds containers are speedy, but may not have much room to improve
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Gartner's Special Report: Should you believe the hype?
Enough hot air to carry a balloon to the Moon
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Dell The Man shrieks: 'We've got a Bitcoin order, we've got a Bitcoin order'
$50k of PowerEdge servers? That'll be 85 coins in digi-dosh
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.